亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        SEVERANCE PAYS

        2017-06-05 15:01:42BYLIUJUE劉玨
        漢語世界 2017年3期

        BY LIU JUE (劉玨)

        SEVERANCE PAYS

        BY LIU JUE (劉玨)

        “I’VE SEEN PEOPLE LITERALLY TEAR UP AGREEMENTS BEHIND THEIR PARTNER’S BACK. WHATEVER YOUR INTENTIONS, ONCE YOU GET DIVORCED, IT’S FOR REAL”

        Even by Chinese standards, it was an eye-opening figure. This March, in the small village of Jiangbei, Jiangsu province, some 160 couples filed for divorce at the same time. But this wasn’t some outbreak of marital discord—the couples, some in their 80s, were merely taking advantage of the fine print in proposals to redevelop their village as a “high-tech development zone.”

        Jiangbei’s homeowners all faced compulsory demolition and relocation to local government-built housing—but single residents could qualify for more property, plus around 131,000 RMB (19,000 USD) extra in compensation, compared to married couples. Hence the rush to“divorce”—as one villager told the Nanjing Morning Post, “Everybody is doing this. We’ll deal with the consequences later.” Local divorce attorneys soon began to charge triple their usual fee of 5,000 RMB.

        Experts warn that the local government may not honor the extra payouts if couples are found to be exploiting loopholes by, for example, remarrying soon after. Others point out that those who do split for financial reasons may end up arguing over the proceeds, and harm their relationships anyway. These warnings have done little to stop the growing popularity of “fake divorces.”

        In August 2016, civil affairs bureaus across Shanghai were flooded by hundreds of couples lining up to part ways because of rumors about an imminent restriction on existing property owners buying more houses. As the real estate market in Shanghai rose an average 5.6 percent in the last week of August, Wind Info, a financial information service in China, described the phenomenon as like “drinking poison in riotous celebration.”

        Some local governments are finding ways to stymie the scam. Beijing, which requires buyers to pay higher deposits for each home bought after the first one in an attempt to cool its overheated property market, released a policy on March 17 clarifying that anyone who has taken out a mortgage is now considered a property owner. Buyers cannot evade the deposit scheme even if they are divorced and without a house registered in their name.

        The practice of fake divorce is not a particularly recent one. Back in 2013, a spate of phony separations prompted Shanghai’s MinhangDistrict Civil Affairs Bureau to famously put up signs cautioning,“Proceed carefully with divorce due to a risky real estate market.”

        And some fake divorces can prove all too real. In March, 44-year-old Beijing resident Mr. Li sued his ex-wife Ms. Wang for the apartments Wang took in her name, after they divorced in order to dodge restrictions on purchasing a third property. But post-divorce, Wang refused to resume the nuptials. These situations have become so recognizable that a fake divorce turned real formed the plot of recent hitI Am Not Madam Bovary, which went on to win Best Picture at the Asian Film Awards.

        Similar cases spring up every day across the country. We invited two experts to weigh in on the topic of fake divorce, and whether it’s a reasonable move to maximize pro fit—or a recipe for marital mayhem.

        With “fake divorces”proving a popular loophole for gaming the housing market, we ask experts if these arrangements guarantee an even split

        中國式“假離婚”背后的復雜真相

        DR. YE ZHUSHENG, LAW PROFESSOR AT THE LAW SCHOOL OF THE SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

        In Chinese, the character for family is “家,” which consists of a roof and a pig underneath. The pig represents an important part of the family’s livelihood. A family therefore signifies people living under the same roof to pursue a prosperous life. The character cleverly combines both spiritual and material elements to form a family. Whoever coined this character, however, never would have expected “fake divorce” to become a trend. In this sense, divorcees give up the spiritual element for material benefit.

        To better understand this phenomenon, the first question we must consider is if the policy has affected the stability of marriage.

        Though purchasing restrictions have led to some fake divorces, they have not necessarily shaken the stability of marriage in general. If a family has only one apartment, many people will be discouraged from getting divorced. Those in better economic circumstances are more open to the option because, if they own two houses, each can get one after they split. The most important economic concern in a divorce, housing, is removed.

        From a long-term point of view, if price-control policies become effectiveand people no longer purchase houses as investments, fewer people will get fake divorces…I’ve read a study that suggests couples are less likely to get divorced during economic depressions. Does that mean we should actively create recession to strengthen marriages?

        From the perspective of the relationship, when marriage is no longer a goal but a tool to achieve something else, the institution itself becomes depreciated. In fact, marriage is indeed not the ultimate goal. The most restrictive system ensures the lowest divorce rate, but does it mean people are blessed with happier lives? Of course not. Therefore, stable marriages are advocated but it doesn’t mean all policy should be designed around that aim.

        Secondly, there are all kinds of factors to consider when it comes to marriage, and policy is just another one of these. Fake divorcees are criticized because they choose financial benefit over relationships, but it’s only human nature to seek benefits, which is beyond reproach. Let’s not forget that the fake divorce is a decision made by both parties. To provide for one’s family is considered more important than the marriage per se. Others may get divorced because of exceptional circumstances (bankruptcy, debts etc.) to protect the other party. This does not devalue their marriage; instead, it shows the strength of the relationship.

        Faced with the same restrictions policy, some couples are unmoved; others are willing to get a fake divorce, which means giving up the legal protection of their union. As long as they are clear-headed making these choices and willing to take responsibility, no one should be blamed for their actions.

        WU JIEZHEN, DIRECTOR OF THE MARRIAGE AND FAMILY LAW DEPARTMENT, F&P LAW FIRM

        Legally, fake divorce carries a very high risk. Once things go south, it’s difficult to protect your rights. After the couple receives the divorce certificate, or the divorce mediation from the court, the marriage is dissolved. Neither the court nor the Bureau of Civil Affairs will investigate your intentions, no matter what they are.

        Legally, there’s no such thing as a“fake divorce.” Even if it surfaces afterwards that the arrangement was to evade debt, emigrate abroad, or for the sake of children’s education, the certificate and mediation won’t be cancelled. The termination of the relationship cannot be mandatorily reversed, which is to say: The law can’t force the two parties to resume marriage.

        There was a regulation that allowed the Bureau of Civil Affairs to withdraw a divorce certificate if it was found to be obtained under false pretenses, and declare the divorce invalid. But this rule has since been struck down.

        Secondly, the property division agreement of a fake divorce is difficult to overturn legally. There’s always a lack of evidence needed to do so.

        According to the judicial interpretation given by the Supreme People’s Court regarding the Marriage Law, [divorce] agreements can only be voided if there proves to be coercion and fraudulence. However, is fake divorce fraudulent? There’s dispute in judicial practice. In some cases, the court has decided that the property can be redistributed because there was no real intention [to divorce]. But in other cases, courts have confirmed the original agreement because fake divorce is not considered fraud.

        Obviously, unfair agreements can be voided according to civic laws and the Contract Law, but when it comes to divorce agreements, such requests are not always supported. Mainstream judicial opinion doesn’t consider divorce agreements as entirely equal to financial agreements. With both parties’ emotions, family responsibilities, and other issues involved, it’s impossible to decide if such an agreement is fair based solely on property division.

        Signing a supplementary agreement to the divorce arrangements is a way to protect your rights, but in reality, most people have no notion of doing this, because they haven’t realized the full risk of a fake divorce. Even if you did sign one, I’ve see people literally tear them up behind their partner’s back once they are divorced.

        Whatever your best intentions, once you get divorced, it’s for real. And you can’t force the other party to remarry. If that’s a consequence you are unable to bear, do not say yes to a fake divorce.

        久久精品国产熟女亚洲| 美女爽好多水快进来视频| 日本一区二区在线播放观看| 国产精品黑丝美腿美臀| 久久国产免费观看精品3| 无码人妻一区二区三区免费n鬼沢| 国产福利美女小视频| 久久国产精品免费专区| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 国产高清精品在线二区| 华人在线视频精品在线| 国产高潮视频在线观看| 91av国产视频| 在线精品亚洲一区二区三区| 中文字幕av高清人妻| 少妇下蹲露大唇无遮挡| 中文字幕在线观看国产双飞高清 | 国产自拍在线观看视频| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频53| 香蕉视频一级片| 亚洲色图少妇熟女偷拍自拍| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 一本一道久久a久久精品综合| 亚洲日韩中文字幕在线播放| 日本视频一区二区三区| 一本丁香综合久久久久不卡网站| 国产av无码专区亚洲av手机麻豆 | 国产成人综合久久精品免费 | 性感的小蜜桃在线观看| 无套中出丰满人妻无码| 精品国精品国产自在久国产应用| 亚洲av套图一区二区| 91精品国产综合久久熟女| 天天鲁一鲁摸一摸爽一爽| 精品国产乱码一区二区三区在线| av免费在线国语对白| 人妻无码中文字幕| 精品视频999| av男人天堂网在线观看| 97se狠狠狠狠狼鲁亚洲综合色| 怡春院欧美一区二区三区免费|