亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        NEW LOWER BOUNDS FOR LEE DISCREPANCY ON TWO AND THREE MIXED LEVELS FACTORIALS?

        2017-01-21 05:31:31ShuoSONG宋碩

        Shuo SONG(宋碩)

        College of Science,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430065,China

        Qionghui ZHANG(張瓊慧)

        Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China

        Na ZOU(鄒娜)

        School of Statistics and Mathematics,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073,China

        Hong QIN(覃紅)?

        Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China

        NEW LOWER BOUNDS FOR LEE DISCREPANCY ON TWO AND THREE MIXED LEVELS FACTORIALS?

        Shuo SONG(宋碩)

        College of Science,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430065,China

        E-mail:songshuo@wust.edu.cn

        Qionghui ZHANG(張瓊慧)

        Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China

        E-mail:zhangqionghui865@163.com

        Na ZOU(鄒娜)

        School of Statistics and Mathematics,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073,China

        E-mail:zounamail@126.com

        Hong QIN(覃紅)?

        Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China

        E-mail:qinhong@mail.ccnu.edu.cn

        The objective of this paper is to study the issue of uniformity on asymmetrical designs with two and three mixed levels in terms of Lee discrepancy.Based on the known formulation,we present a new lower bound of Lee discrepancy of fractional factorial designs with two and three mixed levels.Our new lower bound is sharper and more valid than other existing lower bounds in literature,which is a useful complement to the lower bound theory of discrepancies.

        U-type design;Lee discrepancy;uniform design;lower bound

        2010 MR Subject Classifcation 62K15;62K05

        1 Introduction

        Uniform designs are important methods of computer experiments and robust experimental designs,which spread experimental points uniformly on the experimental domain.The measure of uniformity plays a key role in the construction of uniform designs.Many discrepancies in quasi-Monte Carlo methods were employed to measure the uniformity of designs.For details, we can refer to[4].A design with the smallest discrepancy value is called a uniform design.Among these discrepancies,the Lee discrepancy proposed by[5]was regarded more reasonable and practicable.In this paper,we use Lee discrepancy as the uniformity measure.

        Recently,there was considerable interest in exploring the issue of lower bounds for Lee discrepancy,because lower bounds of Lee discrepancy can be used as a benchmark not only in searching for uniform designs but also in helping to validate that some good designs are in fact uniform or not.Many authors tried to fnd lower bounds to Lee discrepancy so as to obtain most efcient designs.Obviously,a design whose Lee discrepancy value achieves a strict lower bound is a uniform design with respect to this discrepancy.[5]gave some lower bounds for both symmetric and asymmetric U-type designs.[6]provided two improved lower bounds of Lee discrepancy of fractional factorials with two or three levels.[2]obtained a lower bound of Lee discrepancy of asymmetrical factorials with two-and three-levels.[7]studied the uniformity in terms of Lee discrepancy of double designs.Note that two and three mixed levels factorials are most popular among mixed factorials.The present paper aims at obtaining some improved lower bounds for the Lee discrepancy on factorials with two and three mixed levels.

        The remainder of this paper is organized as follows:Section 2 provides the notations and preliminaries.In Section 3,lower bounds for Lee discrepancy are provided.Some illustrative examples are provided in Section 4.

        2 Notations and Preliminaries

        An m-level U-type design belonging to a class U(n;ms)of designs is an n×s array with entries from the set{0,1,···,m?1}such that in each column each of entries of the set {0,1,···,m?1}appears equally often.A U-type design with s1two-level factors and s2threelevel factors belonging to a class U(n;2s13s2)of designs corresponds to an n×s(s=s1+s2) array X=(x1,···,xs)such that each of entries in each column xi(1≤i≤s1)takes values from a set of{0,1}equally often,and each of entries in xi(s1+1≤i≤s)takes values from a set of{0,1,2}equally often.

        For any design d∈U(n;2s13s2),according to[5],Lee-discrepancy value of d,denoted by LD(d),can be calculated by the following formula

        where for i,j=1,···,n,

        For any design d∈U(n;ms)and its corresponding n×s matrix(x1,x2,···,xs),where xj=(x1j,x2j,···,xnj)T,we defne

        where δl1l2(xj)is the Kronecker delta function,equal to 1 if xl1j=xl2jand 0 otherwise.Then we call δl1l2(d)as the coincidence number of the l1th and l2th rows for d.

        where ρ1>0 and ρ2>0 are weights.We call?l1l2(d)the weighted coincidence number of the l1th and l2th rows for d.

        3 Main Results

        In this section,we discuss lower bounds of Lee discrepancy for asymmetrical factorials of two and three levels.The lower bound obtained by[2]is the frst attempt on mixed-level factorials.We state their result as follows.

        Theorem 3.1(see[2]) For any design d∈U(n;2s13s2),we have

        where

        In order to give another lower bound of Lee discrepancy for mixed-level designs,we need the following two important lemmas.

        Lemma 3.3 For any design d∈U(n;2s13s2),and any positive integer t,we have

        By Lemma 3.3,we can deduce a new lower bound of Lee discrepancy for asymmetrical factorials of two and three levels.

        Theorem 3.4 For any design d∈U(n;2s13s2),we have

        where

        and

        Proof By(2.2)we know that,for 1≤ k≤s1,whenotherwiseFurthermore

        For s1+1≤k≤s,whenhence

        Then,(2.1)can be written as

        Let ρ1=ln2,ρ2=ln(3/2),then?ij(d)= ρ1δij(d1)+ρ2δij(d2)is a weighted coincidence number of the ith and jth row of d.Notice that?ii(d)=ρ1s1+ρ2s2,i=1,···,n.Following (3.3),we have

        It is to be noted that

        By use of Lemma 3.3 and some algebra calculus,we can get(3.2),which completes the proof. ?

        In order to compare the diference between LB2and LB1,we give some fgures below and examples in the next section.Figures 1 and 2 show how the diference between LB2and LB1varies by n,s2(or n,s1)when s1(or s2)is fxed.From these fgures and examples in the next section,we could conclude empirically that LB2is larger than LB1in most cases,and when s1or s2gets bigger,the diference between LB2and LB1intends to get bigger.

        Figure 1 Diference between LB1and LB2

        Figure 2 Diference between LB1and LB2continued

        Combine Theorems 3.1 and 3.4,we can get an improved lower bound of Lee discrepancy for any design with two and three mixed levels.

        Theorem 3.5Consider any design d∈U(n;2s13s2),then

        where LB=max{LB1,LB2}.

        Note that,if s1=0 or s2=0,Theorem 3.4 still holds.As a consequence,we can easily get the following corollary.

        Corollary 3.6Consider any design d∈U(n;ms),

        (1)when m=2,we have

        where

        (2)when m=3,we have

        where

        4 Numerical Studies

        Example 4.1Take n=18,s1=1,s2=7,8,9.Table 1 shows three U-type designs denoted by d18,1,7,d18,1,8,d18,1,9respectively,the numerical results are also shown in Table 1. It is easily to see that the new lower bounds behave better than the old ones.

        Table 1 18-run asymmetrical factorial of two and three level

        Example 4.2Take n=12,s1=3,s2=4,5,6.Table 2 shows three U-type designs denoted by d12,3,4,d12,3,5,d12,3,6,respectively,the numerical results are also shown in Table 2. It is easily to see that LB2is bigger than LB1,the new lower bounds behave better than the old ones.

        Example 4.3Take n=12,s2=5,s1=10,11,12.Table 3 shows three U-type designs denoted by d12,10,5,d12,11,5,d12,12,5respectively,the numerical results are also shown in Table 3.It is also easily to see that the new lower bounds behave better than the old ones.

        Table 2 12-run asymmetrical factorial of two and three level

        Table 3 12-run asymmetrical factorial of two and three level

        [1]Chatterjee K,Li Z H,Qin H.Some new lower bounds to centered and wrap-around L2-discrepancies.Statist Probab Letters,2012,82:1367–1373

        [2]Chatterjee K,Qin H,Zou N.Lee discrepancy on asymmetrical factorials with two-and three-levels.Science China Mathematics,2012,55:663–670

        [3]Elsawah M A,Qin H.New lower bound for centered L2-discrepancy of four-level U-type designs.Statist Probab Letters,2014,93:65–71

        [4]Fang K T,Li R,Sudjianto A.Design and Modelling for Computer Experiments.London:Chapman and Hall,2005

        [5]Zhou Y D,Ning J H,Song X B.Lee discrepancy and its applications in experimental designs.Statist Probab Letters,2008,78:1933–1942

        [6]Zou N,Ren P,Qin H.A note on Lee discrepancy.Statist Probab Letters,2009,79:496–500

        [7]Zou N,Qin H.Some properties of double designs in terms of Lee discrepancy.Acta Matematica Scientia, accepted,2016

        ?Received January 24,2015;revised May 3,2016.The third author was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11301546).The fourth author is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11271147,11471136).

        ?Corresponding author:Hong QIN.

        无码中文字幕专区一二三| 超级碰碰色偷偷免费视频| 久久精品视频在线看99| 国产精品高潮av有码久久| 亚洲综合中文一区二区| 亚洲中文无码av永久| 精产国品一二三产品蜜桃| 精品少妇大屁股白浆无码| 国产一区二区三区涩涩涩 | av网站影片在线观看| 蜜桃视频第一区免费观看| 国产精品特级毛片一区二区三区| 乌克兰少妇xxxx做受6| 亚洲国产视频精品一区二区| 99久久久人妻熟妇精品一区二区| 极品白嫩的小少妇| 免费人成又黄又爽的视频在线 | 国内自拍视频在线观看h| 亚洲国产精品av在线| 亚洲精品无码久久久久牙蜜区| 97色偷偷色噜噜狠狠爱网站97| 丰满熟女人妻一区二区三区 | 国产免费av片无码永久免费| 国产精品一久久香蕉国产线看观看| 国内偷拍视频一区二区| 国产精品国产三级国产a| 国产久热精品无码激情| 在线观看精品国产福利片87| 91国产自拍精品视频| 四川丰满妇女毛片四川话| 精品人无码一区二区三区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区在线| 狠狠cao日日橹夜夜十橹| 国模少妇一区二区三区| 国产精品不卡无码AV在线播放| 免费一区二区在线观看视频在线| 日产学生妹在线观看| 国产精品毛片无码久久| 高潮av一区二区三区| 国产亚洲一区二区在线观看| 日韩毛片在线|