亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Misconceptions in global reactions and formula writing Stig R.JOHANSSON*

        2016-11-28 07:49:44TheSwedishSectionforDetonicsandCombustionSweden
        Defence Technology 2016年5期

        The Swedish Section for Detonics and Combustion,Sweden

        Available online 25 July 2016

        Misconceptions in global reactions and formula writing Stig R.JOHANSSON*

        The Swedish Section for Detonics and Combustion,Sweden

        Available online 25 July 2016

        The frequently used concept of“global reaction”is discussed and the reason for the confusion behind explained.The misconception is cleared by formula writing based on the donor–acceptor(donac)reaction concept and by applying the Grand Rule of Formula Writing that is based on it. ?2016 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of China Ordnance Society.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

        Global reaction;Donac reactions;Formula writing;Pyrotechnics;Chlorate manufacture

        1.Introduction

        The concept of“global reaction”originates in formula writing and stoichiometry not being kept apart,which results in an erroneous mono-reaction formula and loss of degrees of freedom.The donor–acceptor(donac)method of formula writing[1]prevents the mistake from being made and does away with the misleading concept as such.The species being donated/accepted,Y,can be any molecule,atom or ion(e.g.,the protonforacid–basereactions,theelectronforredox reactions).

        According to The Grand Rule of Formula Writing,a donor–acceptor reaction formula shall not contain more than two conjugated donor–acceptor pairs.One starts by specifying the reactants(chosen)in the initial state of the process to be studied as well as the products found(chemical analysis)in the final state.

        An area where global reactions often appear is that of energetic materials.The donac method–how it works,what it means–will now be shown with a couple of examples.As illustrated by the chlorate example,the donac formula writing method takes us a little step further,viz.,from the empirical“know how”level to the phenomenological[1]“know why”level.

        2.Air bag composition

        A“typical air bag gas generator reaction”[2]is said to be

        R 1 is a global-reaction formula of the process.The donac formula writing procedure preferably starts by applying“The Principle of States”,i.e.,by specifying the initial state containing the three reactants and the final state containing the three products–and residual reactants,if any–found

        A suitable choice ofY is the oxygen atom,which is donated by Fe2O3and NaNO3,whereby Fe(+3)is reduced to Fe(0)and N(+5)to N(0).

        The azide is the acceptor,where N(-1/3)is oxidized to N(0).

        Combining these half-reactions so that the auxiliary“bartering item”,the oxygen atom,disappears,R 2+R 4 give the rule-abiding formula

        The molar nitrogen:azide ratio of R 5 is 9:6=1.50:1.Likewise,R 3+R 4 give and the ratio 8:5=1.60:1.Thus,the nitrate gives 7%more nitrogen gas per mole sodium azide than the iron oxide does,or 19%more gas per gram of composition.

        http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2016.07.001

        2214-9147/?2016 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of China Ordnance Society.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

        The product development task for this life-saving pyrotechnic product must be to get as much gas as possible in shortest possible time.Correct formula writing has now led us to a question that must have a rational answer,viz.,why is the iron oxide there?A possible answer may be that it acts as a catalyst;“in shortest possible time”is also an important characteristic of the composition.If so,one should perhaps start looking for more effective alternatives that in addition to promoting faster gas production also“cost”less yield reduction(a lucky strike would be to find a catalyst increasing the gas production!).

        The correct description of the state change–which turned out to be a poly-reaction process–is R 5 and R 6 in parallel. Adding them can be done in any ratio.If this be 1:1,for example,we get(the quotation marks indicate“false”)

        and the molar nitrogen:azide ratio 17:11=1.55:1.The ratio of the Laib–Conkling formula R 1,which presumably is the optimal one,is 44:29=1.52:1.This formula is the addition result of 4·(R 5)+1·(R 6).

        With a global formula,a degree of freedom is lost and the“chemistry”becomes obscure–and the questions promoting creativity and thus the development work do not present themselves.

        How is the overall stoichiometry of a global“experimental”formula like R 1 and R 7 found if not by empirical x·(R 5)+y·(R 6)addition?The auxiliary merit of a global formula is that the molar NaN3:Fe2O3:NaNO3ratios are perspicuously given by the chosen stoichiometric numbers,e.g.,29:4:1 for R 1 and 11:1:1 for R 7.For finding the optimal ratios in the laboratory,various mixes have to be prepared and tested.The choice of NaN3:Fe2O3:NaNO3ratios may be facilitated by understanding that it in fact is a choice of(R 5):(R 6)ratios(i.e., of x and y).

        3.Pyrotechnic nitrate composition

        The following“main reaction formula”appeared in a conference paper[3].

        We find that it contains five donac pairs,viz.

        where ammonium nitrogen is oxidized from N(-3)to N(0), nitrate nitrogen reduced from N(+5)to N(0),hydrogen reduced from H(+1)to H(0)and carbon oxidized from C(0)to C(+2) and C(+4).The nitrogen atoms in ammonium nitrate are stoichiometrically coupled to the formal valence of N(+1).With Y1=O andY2=H,we get one oxygen donor and three oxygen acceptors

        Cancelling the bartering objects by the following operations

        R 14 through R 17 can be added to a global reaction in any relation by multiplying them by a,b,c,d,respectively.As far as R 8 is concerned,the stoichiometric relations between them are a+b+c+2d=6(for NH4NO3and N2),a+b+3c+d=4(C), 2a+b+4d=11(H2O),a+3c=1(CO),b+d=3(CO2)and b+2c=1(H2).Despite the fact that the equation system is redundant,solving for the 4 unknowns is not possible due to interrelations.Selecting the fourth,fifth and sixth equations only,we get the relations d=3-b,a=1-3c and b=1-2c. Choosing a=1,we finally get b=1,c=0 and d=2,giving R 8.Thus,R 14 and R 15 account for 25%each of the process, R 17 for 50%.

        Even if R 8 happens to reflect the correct product distribution according to a certain set of quantitative analysis data,it should be obvious–and good to know–that the product distribution depends on the prevailing conditions of the study. Degrees of freedom have been lost–obviously without the writer being aware of it.

        With correct formula writing,we are faced with an interesting,practical question:What determines the reaction ratios,i.e., the multiplication factors a,b,c and d?

        4.Electrochemical chlorate formation[4,5]

        The overall reaction formula of the electrochemical process

        The electrolysis part is(note that Cl2is a solute)

        preferably followed in a separate reactor by

        Here the last main-road process,the Balard autoxidation reactions,occurs([5],p.2)

        If R 20 were allowed to occur in the electrolyte,the following“one and only”yield-decreasing by-reaction–as maintained in the literature–takes place at the anode.

        This formula of electrochemical chlorate formation was given by the German chemists Foerster and Müller in 1902[6]. Forty-three years later and in another country,the Spaniards Rius and Llopis published their“stoichiometry”[7].

        The chlorate yield of R 22 is 66.7%(only 6 O atoms out of 9 give chlorate,3 are lost as O2),the corresponding yield of R 22 is 69.2%(9 O out of 13)[8].

        In a textbook on electrochemistry,this disturbing disagreement caused the footnote comment that if the Spaniards’result is confirmed by further experiments,“then the theoretical data for the current yield,as given by Foerster and Müller,must be corrected”.

        There is nothing to correct as far as R 22 as such is concerned.

        Both R 22 and R 23 contain three donac pairs,which is two too many.As a consequence,three electron reaction formulas are required for describing the process.

        viz.

        In the reaction formulas from 1902 and 1945 these electron (but not necessarily electrode)reactions have been inconsiderably added.With The Grand Rule in mind,it goes without saying that the product distribution varies with the test conditions,and that it is very unlikely that they should have been the same in Spain 1945 as they were in Germany 1902–or in any other study,for that matter.

        A question that now presents itself is:what is the yieldreducing process,then?Noting that R 26 is a cathode reaction, if any,and not a chlorate producing reaction makes R 25 alone look like a possible electrochemical chlorate formation candidate.It is to be noted that the yield of this reaction is 100%! Remains R 24 to account for the reduction;the percentage could–at least in principle–be anything.

        Among the yield-reducing processes of R 18 is,of course, Cl2→Cl2(g).

        5.Conclusion

        Erroneously written and thought-hampering“global reactions”,as now discussed,is just one example of the need to“increase our knowledge”,as the Scottish philosopher W.A. Sinclair puts it.He writes([9]):“To increase our knowledge is to alter for the better our ways of‘selecting’and‘grouping’[10];to notice it in ways which are new to us,and probably strange”.And further:“we move from one to another without noticing it”,which is exactly what led to“global reaction”.

        References

        [1]Johansson SR.Elementary chemical mathematics(chemistry in a broader setting).AuthorHouse;2016.p.7,9–15,278.

        [2]Laib GR,Conkling J.Trends and directions in civilian pyrotechnics technology:an American perspective.Plenary lecture presented at the 16th international pyrotechnics seminar,J?nk?ping,Sweden,1991.

        [3]Yuliang Y,Fengjia Y,Shuzen X.Mechanism and kinetic parameters of the reaction of pyrotechnic mixture of NH4NO3,C and NH4Cl. Proceedings of the international symposium on pyrotechnics and explosives,Beijing,1987,p.155.

        [4]WranglénG.Kloratelektrolysensteori(thetheoryofchlorate electrolysis).Teknisk Tidskrift 1967;10:177.

        [5]Hammar L,Wranglén G.Cathodic and anodic efficiency losses in chlorate electrolysis.Electrochim Acta 1964;9:1.

        [6]Foerster F,Müller E.Ztschr Elektrochem 1902;8:515–665.

        [7]Rius A,Llopis J.Anal fis y chim 1945;41:1030.

        [8]Angel G.Klorat och perklorat(chlorate and perchlorate).Handbok i kemisk teknologi,vol.2.Stockholm:1948.p.406.

        [9]Sinclair WA.An introduction to philosophy.2nd ed.Oxford:Oxford University Press;1945.

        [10]Einstein A.Induction and deduction in physics.Berliner Tageblatt;1919.

        Peer review under responsibility of China Ordnance Society.

        .Tel.:+4636 163734.

        E-mail address:stru.johansson@telia.com(S.R.JOHANSSON).

        17 May 2016;revised 12 July 2016;accepted 18 July 2016

        夜夜春精品视频| 女人高潮久久久叫人喷水| 亚洲av午夜国产精品无码中文字| 欧美成人精品第一区二区三区| 国产一区二区女内射| 久久精品免视看国产成人| 亚洲人成亚洲人成在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区av在线免费| 国产国语一级免费黄片| 久久精品国产熟女亚洲| 欧洲熟妇色xxxx欧美老妇多毛| 日韩欧美第一页| 久久久99精品视频| 蜜臀人妻精品一区二区免费 | 精品人妻大屁股白浆无码| 免费无码又爽又刺激聊天app| 亚洲国产中文在线二区三区免| 国产精品欧美成人片| 中文字幕一区二区黄色| 蜜桃日本免费观看mv| 久久久久无码精品亚洲日韩| 国产一级r片内射免费视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩综合| 无码中文字幕免费一区二区三区| 精品国产福利一区二区在线| 激情五月婷婷六月俺也去| 蜜臀av在线一区二区尤物| 亚洲精品无码永久在线观看| 国产成人综合久久精品免费| 亚洲一区sm无码| 国产一区二区三区av观看| 亚洲中字幕日产av片在线| 久久精品国产亚洲精品| 久久久99久久久国产自输拍| 青青草成人免费在线视频| 国产亚洲日本精品无码| 麻豆久久五月国产综合| 极品少妇一区二区三区| 亚州性无码不卡免费视频| 日韩制服国产精品一区| 精品人无码一区二区三区|