吳超琛,張 曉
(廣東省人民醫(yī)院風(fēng)濕內(nèi)科,廣州 510080)
間質(zhì)性肺病(interstitial lung disease,ILD)是一類具有相似的影像學(xué)、病理學(xué)和臨床表現(xiàn)特點(diǎn)的肺臟薄壁組織炎癥性疾病。結(jié)締組織病(connective tissue disease,CTD)作為一類病因明確的疾病,包括硬皮病(systemic sclerosis,SSc)、皮肌炎/多發(fā)性肌炎(dermatomysitis/polymysitis,DM/PM)、類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎(rheumatoid arthritis,RA)、系統(tǒng)性紅斑狼瘡(systemic lupus erythematosus,SLE)、原發(fā)性干燥綜合征(primary Sj?gren syndrome,pSS)、混合性結(jié)締組織病(mixed connective tissue disease,MCTD)和未分化的結(jié)締組織病(undifferentiated connective tissue disease,UCTD)等,其合并ILD的發(fā)生率分別為SSc 55%~65%,DM/PM 5%~30%,RA 10%~12%,SLE 3%,pSS 0.1%~3%[1]。研究認(rèn)為,結(jié)締組織病相關(guān)間質(zhì)性肺病(connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease,CTD-ILD)的發(fā)生、發(fā)展由炎癥啟動(dòng),造成肺泡上皮受損,激活原位肺成纖維細(xì)胞及肌成纖維細(xì)胞,通過轉(zhuǎn)化生長因子β(transforming growth facfor-β,TGF-β)依賴的經(jīng)典通路調(diào)節(jié)受損肺組織的纖維化相關(guān)的微環(huán)境;此外還發(fā)現(xiàn),自身抗體與CTD-ILD具有相關(guān)性,但是具體機(jī)制尚不明確[2]。2013年美國胸科學(xué)會(huì)-歐洲呼吸學(xué)會(huì)(American Thoracis-European Respiratory Society,ATS-ERS)對(duì)特發(fā)性間質(zhì)性肺炎的分類進(jìn)行了重新修訂,這次新分類把特發(fā)性間質(zhì)性肺炎分為主要的、罕見的和不可分類三大類,而所有肺間質(zhì)病變的病理類型在CTD-ILD中都可找到,并且在同一例患者身上可同時(shí)出現(xiàn)多種病理類型,目前主要分為尋常型間質(zhì)性肺炎(usual interstitial pneumonia,UIP)、非特異性間質(zhì)性肺炎(fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia,NSIP)及其他類型如淋巴細(xì)胞性間質(zhì)性肺炎(lymphoid interstitial pneumonia,LIP)、隱源性機(jī)化性肺炎(cryptogenic organizing pneumonia,COP)等[3]。目前臨床上診斷CTD-ILD主要依靠高分辨率CT(high-resolution computed tomography,HRCT)、肺活檢和肺功能檢測(cè)。HRCT和肺活檢病理在UIP的診斷上特異度高達(dá)96%,由于HRCT高度敏感,一些亞臨床的征象被過度解讀,且其具有放射性,費(fèi)用較高,患者接受度不佳[2]。目前獲取肺組織的方法包括開胸肺活檢、胸腔鏡下肺活檢及CT引導(dǎo)下經(jīng)皮肺穿刺活檢三種,開胸肺活檢創(chuàng)傷大且患者不易接受,現(xiàn)臨床已很少開展;胸腔鏡下肺活檢極少引起開胸肺活檢常見的并發(fā)癥,同時(shí)取材滿意,但患者對(duì)有創(chuàng)檢查的接受度及配合度低;而CT引導(dǎo)下經(jīng)皮肺活檢,簡單易行且損傷小,并可提前確定和調(diào)整進(jìn)針角度及深度,具有更高的安全性,但缺點(diǎn)是無法做到多點(diǎn)取材。肺功能檢查安全易行,且彌散功能下降是診斷CTD-ILD公認(rèn)的依據(jù)之一,但肺功能檢查的重復(fù)性較差,在不同實(shí)驗(yàn)室進(jìn)行的肺功能檢查,一氧化碳彌散量(carbon monoxide diffusing capacity,DLCO)變異很大,這種差異受具體機(jī)器型號(hào)及患者的配合程度等影響[2]。肺泡灌洗液(bronchoalveolar lavage fluid,BALF)的細(xì)胞計(jì)數(shù)由于變化大、特異性小,其診斷和預(yù)后價(jià)值仍具有爭(zhēng)議[4]。因此尋找簡便、易行、可靠的早期診斷方法成為一種趨勢(shì)。
表面活性蛋白A(surfactant protein A,SP-A)和SP-D是由Ⅱ型肺泡上皮細(xì)胞合成和分泌的一種脂蛋白,不僅能夠降低肺泡表面張力,而且在肺的宿主防御反應(yīng)中起重要作用。在SSc-ILD患者中,SP-D檢測(cè)ILD的敏感度高于SP-A,特異度低于SP-A[5- 6];SP-D水平與HRCT最大纖維化評(píng)分呈正相關(guān),與用力肺活量(forced vital capacity,F(xiàn)VC)、肺活量(vital capacity,VC)、DLCO等指標(biāo)呈負(fù)相關(guān)[5]。研究表明,在SSc-ILD、DM/PM-ILD患者中血清SP-A和SP-D升高,提示肺纖維化的活動(dòng)度及惡化趨勢(shì)[5,7]。Arai等[7]證實(shí),DM/PM-ILD患者SP-D水平在開始治療4周內(nèi)持續(xù)升高,提示治療效果不佳,應(yīng)當(dāng)結(jié)合其他指標(biāo)考慮調(diào)整治療方案。
糖蛋白(Krebs vonden lungen- 6,KL- 6)是由Ⅱ型肺泡細(xì)胞和呼吸性細(xì)支氣管上皮細(xì)胞分泌的一種大分子量糖蛋白(200 kDa),在細(xì)胞增生或損傷后增加,具有促進(jìn)纖維母細(xì)胞增殖,抑制其凋亡,介導(dǎo)成肌纖維細(xì)胞分化的功效,且在不同類型的CTD-ILD疾病中均升高。一項(xiàng)單中心的回顧性縱向研究顯示,SSc-ILD患者KL- 6滴度升高的試驗(yàn)組死亡風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加,環(huán)磷酰胺治療后滴度可降低,故認(rèn)為KL- 6有望成為肺纖維化嚴(yán)重程度評(píng)估的指標(biāo),但此研究對(duì)ILD的活動(dòng)度評(píng)價(jià)價(jià)值尚不能確定[8]。亦有研究表明,血清KL- 6升高同SSc-ILD患者的BALF嗜酸粒細(xì)胞計(jì)數(shù)增加及HRCT顯示磨玻璃樣變的結(jié)果相一致,認(rèn)為KL- 6對(duì)ILD的發(fā)生和發(fā)展有評(píng)估作用[9];Oyama等[10]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),血清KL- 6值升高的RA患者大部分被診斷為活動(dòng)性間質(zhì)性肺炎,且隨著肺間質(zhì)改變累及范圍的增加血清值亦升高,認(rèn)為KL- 6的異常升高可反映間質(zhì)性肺炎肺細(xì)胞損傷及肺部受累的程度。另外DM/PM-ILD患者血清KL- 6水平與其肺功能參數(shù)呈負(fù)相關(guān),且對(duì)診斷ILD的敏感度及特異度均較高[11]。
目前已經(jīng)認(rèn)識(shí)到自身抗體參與CTD的病理生理過程和組織損傷,其中不同類型的抗體提示不同CTD-ILD的發(fā)生、發(fā)展及預(yù)后情況?,F(xiàn)有研究發(fā)現(xiàn),與DM/PM-ILD相關(guān)的自身抗體有:抗臨床無肌病性皮肌炎-140(clinically amyopathic DM-140,CADM-140)、抗氨酰tRNA合成酶(aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases antibodies,ARS)、抗Mi-2、抗p155/140(TIF1γ)抗體;與SSc-ILD相關(guān)的自身抗體有:抗U11/U12 RNP、抗Scl-70、抗ACA/CENP(A-E)、抗histone抗體;與RA-ILD相關(guān)的自身抗體有:抗環(huán)瓜氨酸肽(cysic citrullinated peptides,CCP)、抗PAD3/4XR抗體[12](表1)。其中相關(guān)性較高、預(yù)測(cè)能力較強(qiáng)的抗體為抗ARS、抗CADM-140、抗CCP抗體。
表1 自身抗體與CTD-ILD的關(guān)系Table 1 Relationship of autoantibody and CTD-ILD
++表示嚴(yán)重ILD;+表示與ILD相關(guān);SSc:硬皮病;RA:類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎;PM/DM:多發(fā)性肌炎/皮肌炎;MCTD:混合性結(jié)締組織炎;pSS:原發(fā)性干燥綜合征;SLE:系統(tǒng)性紅斑狼瘡;UCTD:未分化的結(jié)締組織??;CTD-ILD:結(jié)締組織病-間質(zhì)性肺病
抗ARS抗體屬于肌炎特異性抗體(myositis-specific autoantibodies,MSAs),目前已經(jīng)確認(rèn)和報(bào)道的有八種類型:抗Jo-1、抗PL-7、抗EJ、抗PL-12、抗KS、抗OJ、抗ZO和抗Ha抗體[13]。其中抗Jo-1抗體對(duì)肌炎相關(guān)的ILD預(yù)測(cè)能力最強(qiáng)[13];而抗PL-7、抗EJ抗體陽性與有肺臟受累的肌炎患者更相關(guān)[14];抗PL-12、抗KS和抗OJ抗體在人群中陽性率低,但抗體檢測(cè)陽性高度提示孤立性的ILD[15]。有研究發(fā)現(xiàn),抗ARS抗體陽性患者的預(yù)后及免疫抑制劑對(duì)其治療效果好[16]。而抗Jo-1抗體陰性組患者的生存率比抗Jo-1抗體陽性組低,作者將其歸因于對(duì)抗Jo-1抗體陰性組ILD診斷的滯后[17]。
抗CADM-140抗體以黑色素瘤分化相關(guān)基因5 anti-citrullinated protein/peptide autoantibodies,(melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5,MDA5)為靶抗原,多見于東亞地區(qū)人群。在DM患者中,抗CADM-140抗體是急性進(jìn)展性ILD(rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease,RPILD)的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素,抗體滴度高可提示疾病活動(dòng)及嚴(yán)重程度,治療后抗體滴度水平下降可表明疾病緩解[18]。
抗瓜氨酸化蛋白/肽抗體(ACPAs)是機(jī)體針對(duì)瓜氨酸化的蛋白、肽鏈產(chǎn)生的抗體。RA-ILD患者中,抗CCP抗體滴度越高的患者其CT評(píng)分越高,且這些患者常伴有肺功能障礙和彌散功能受損[12]。英國一項(xiàng)多中心研究納入230例RA-ILD患者,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)抗CCP抗體與是否合并ILD具有強(qiáng)相關(guān)性(OR=4)[19]。
Harlow等[20]從RA患者的瓜氨酸化抗CCP抗體的蛋白提取物中分離出抗瓜氨酸化的熱休克蛋白90的同型抗體(anti-citrullinated Hsp90 α/β antibodies),認(rèn)為該抗體在肺臟產(chǎn)生和成熟,可將其作為區(qū)分ILD陽性組與ILD陰性組的自身抗體標(biāo)志物,其診斷RA-ILD的敏感度和特異度分別為54%和75%。
基質(zhì)金屬蛋白酶(matrixmetalloproteinases,MMPs)是一類鋅依賴的蛋白酶,具有降解細(xì)胞外基質(zhì)和裂解膠原分子的功能,基質(zhì)金屬蛋白酶組織抑制因子(tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinasas,TIMPs)是MMPs抑制劑,在炎癥反應(yīng)時(shí)炎性細(xì)胞和巨噬細(xì)胞MMPs和TIMPs表達(dá)增加,加劇炎癥反應(yīng)和促進(jìn)纖維化進(jìn)程,引起肺組織損傷和重構(gòu),導(dǎo)致肺功能下降[21]。在SSc-ILD患者中,血清MMP-12水平的上升與FVC的下降更為相關(guān),而BALF中MMP-9濃度上升與中性粒細(xì)胞、肥大細(xì)胞計(jì)數(shù)升高保持一致,與肺總量(total lung capacity,TLC)下降也呈明顯正相關(guān)性[22]。RA-ILD患者M(jìn)MP-7的血清濃度上升時(shí),患者肺部臨床表現(xiàn)加重,DLCO和FVC也下降顯著[21]。Oka等[23]研究發(fā)現(xiàn)CTD-ILD死亡組中,處于急性起病期的患者血清MMP-3/TIMP-1比值相較于穩(wěn)定期患者明顯下降,而在生存組中不同疾病時(shí)期的比值無差異,所以認(rèn)為該比值可反映CTD-ILD患者急性起病的預(yù)后。
去整合素樣金屬蛋白酶12(A disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 12,ADAM12)又稱融合素α,是一類細(xì)胞膜表面具備多功能的糖蛋白家族成員之一,具有金屬蛋白酶的特性,在細(xì)胞分化、黏附、融合和相互作用過程中發(fā)揮重要作用。Taniguchi等[24]對(duì)61例SSc患者血清ADAM12-S進(jìn)行檢測(cè),發(fā)現(xiàn)病程≤6年的SSc患者血清ADAM12-S水平相對(duì)于健康組有明顯升高,且與HRCT評(píng)分、FVC、C-反應(yīng)蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)水平有顯著相關(guān)性,但病程>6年的SSc患者ADAM12-S水平同健康組并無明顯差異,所以認(rèn)為ADAM12-S的血清值能一定程度反映ILD疾病的炎癥活動(dòng)情況。
CCL和CXCL家族的趨化因子對(duì)單核細(xì)胞、T淋巴細(xì)胞等有較強(qiáng)的趨化作用,參與CTD患者受損肺組織的修復(fù)和重構(gòu)過程,其血清和BALF的水平變化能反映ILD疾病的活動(dòng)及預(yù)后情況。
CCL2又稱為單核細(xì)胞趨化因子(monocyte chemotactic protein 1,MCP1),SSc-ILD疾病終末期的CCL2濃度升高相對(duì)于穩(wěn)定期和進(jìn)展期有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,同時(shí)伴有HRCT評(píng)分升高,DLCO、FVC、TLC下降,對(duì)臨床上評(píng)估ILD嚴(yán)重程度有一定的提示作用[25]。CCL18又稱肺活化調(diào)節(jié)的趨化因子(pulmonary and activation regulated chemokine,PARC),一項(xiàng)回顧性隊(duì)列研究發(fā)現(xiàn),血清CCL18水平>187 ng/ml時(shí)能獨(dú)立預(yù)測(cè)SSc-ILD的病情惡化,敏感度和特異度分別為53%和96%,隨后對(duì)該組患者平均隨訪(33.4±10.8)個(gè)月,患者肺功能惡化風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加,校正風(fēng)險(xiǎn)比為5.36[26]。
CXCL10又稱為干擾素γ誘導(dǎo)蛋白10(interferon gamma-induced protein 10,IP10),由Th1淋巴細(xì)胞分泌,Antonelli等[27]將72例新診斷的SSc患者與健康者進(jìn)行性別和年齡的配對(duì)后,檢測(cè)發(fā)現(xiàn)SSc新確診患者血清CXCL10水平相對(duì)健康組有明顯上升,其中SSc-ILD的患者CXCL10水平顯著高于未合并ILD的患者,研究人員認(rèn)為CXCL10高水平有助于臨床判斷SSc合并肺受累,隨后對(duì)SSc患者隨訪5年,復(fù)測(cè)CXCL10水平反而明顯下降,考慮疾病由早期炎癥主導(dǎo)階段(Th1為主)向后期非炎癥和纖維化階段(Th2為主)轉(zhuǎn)換。CXCL12又稱為基質(zhì)細(xì)胞衍生因子-1(stromal cell derived factor 1,SDF-1),SSc-ILD患者肺組織CXCL12及其受體CXCR4表達(dá)上調(diào),通過CXCL12/CXCR4生物軸能促進(jìn)纖維細(xì)胞向肌成纖維細(xì)胞轉(zhuǎn)化和細(xì)胞外基質(zhì)沉積,加速肺纖維化發(fā)病進(jìn)程[28]。
CXCL4即血小板因子4(platelet factor 4),抑制具有抗纖維化功能的細(xì)胞因子INF-γ表達(dá),上調(diào)白細(xì)胞介素(interleukin,IL)- 4、IL-13,刺激抑制功能受損的調(diào)節(jié)性T細(xì)胞增殖,van Bon等[29]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),CXCL4不僅與SSc患者皮膚和肺部疾病強(qiáng)相關(guān),還能預(yù)測(cè)不同類型SSc的疾病進(jìn)展,提出檢測(cè)CXCL4對(duì)SSc-ILD早期診斷、纖維化評(píng)估和采取何種臨床治療方案均有較好的指導(dǎo)作用。
IL是由單核巨噬細(xì)胞和T淋巴細(xì)胞分泌的具有某些非特異性免疫調(diào)節(jié)作用且在炎癥反應(yīng)中起關(guān)鍵作用的細(xì)胞因子,對(duì)細(xì)胞的生長、分化起重要調(diào)節(jié)作用。SSc-ILD患者血清IL-21水平升高,IL-17、IL-23水平明顯降低,且IL-17水平與疾病病程長短呈負(fù)相關(guān),與HRCT評(píng)分呈正相關(guān),IL-23濃度與DLCO、TLC、6分鐘步行試驗(yàn)呈負(fù)相關(guān),認(rèn)為這些Th17相關(guān)的細(xì)胞因子參與SSc-ILD的發(fā)生[30]。DM/PM-ILD患者IL- 6、IL- 8水平明顯升高,其中IL- 8水平在抗MDA5抗體相關(guān)的ILD組顯著高于抗ARS抗體相關(guān)的ILD組,而IL- 4/IFN-γ比值結(jié)果相反,故認(rèn)為IL- 4、IFN-γ之間的平衡和IL- 8參與不同抗體相關(guān)的ILD組的病理生理過程[31]。
賴氨酰氧化酶(lysyl-oxidase,LOX)是銅離子依賴的胺氧化酶,能夠在細(xì)胞外基質(zhì)氧化膠原蛋白和彈性蛋白上的特殊氨基酸殘基,目前有望成為預(yù)測(cè)SSc相關(guān)纖維化和疾病嚴(yán)重程度的新興生物標(biāo)志物。已有研究報(bào)道SSc患者血清LOX水平升高與皮膚纖維化明確相關(guān),Rimar等[32]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),大部分血清LOX水平升高的患者合并有肺纖維化,且同時(shí)伴有FVC下降,但仍需后續(xù)研究證實(shí)LOX與肺纖維化的關(guān)系。
小窩蛋白-1(caveolin-1)是支架蛋白,介導(dǎo)單核細(xì)胞及其來源的細(xì)胞的功能和信號(hào)轉(zhuǎn)導(dǎo)。SSc-ILD患者,單核細(xì)胞中caveolin-1水平下降,單核細(xì)胞表型及遷移活性改變,分化為纖維細(xì)胞聚集于肺臟促進(jìn)ILD的發(fā)生[28]。此外,非裔美國人單核細(xì)胞中caveolin-1基線水平低,使得SSc患者更易合并ILD[33]。
幾丁質(zhì)酶1(chitinase 1)為真性甲殼素酶,甲殼質(zhì)酶3類似物1(YKL- 40)屬于甲殼素酶樣蛋白。Nordenbk等[34]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),SSc-ILD組患者血清YKL- 40水平較非ILD組明顯升高,平均生存時(shí)間縮短。
S100A8/A9又名鈣結(jié)合蛋白(calprotectin),是Toll樣受體4(TLR4)的內(nèi)源性配體,而TLR4信號(hào)通路能促進(jìn)纖維母細(xì)胞增殖和肺纖維化的發(fā)生[35]。而在SSc-ILD患者中,發(fā)現(xiàn)血清和BALF中S100A8/A9濃度明顯升高[9,35]。
另外,有研究發(fā)現(xiàn)生長分化因子15(GDP-15)、Clara細(xì)胞蛋白16(Clara-cell protein 16,CC16)、固生蛋白(tenascin-C)、軟骨寡聚基質(zhì)蛋白(cartilage oligomeric matrix protein,COMP)、胸腺素(thymosin β4)、可溶性選擇素糖蛋白配體(soluble p-selection glycoprotein ligand-1,sPSGL-1)等與CTD-ILD發(fā)病機(jī)制可能相關(guān),是否可成為生物標(biāo)志物還有待進(jìn)一步研究。
目前,KL- 6、SP-D等作為ILD的生物標(biāo)志物,因其較高的敏感度和特異度已被廣泛證實(shí)且逐步應(yīng)用于臨床,對(duì)并發(fā)ILD發(fā)生率較高的SSc和DM/PM具有較好的指導(dǎo)意義,但大多數(shù)生物標(biāo)志物尚處于實(shí)驗(yàn)室研究認(rèn)證階段,且缺乏疾病特異性(表2)。生物標(biāo)志物在CTD-ILD的診斷、嚴(yán)重度的評(píng)估、疾病進(jìn)展的預(yù)測(cè)、治療效果的評(píng)估等方面的作用尚需多中心、大樣本的研究及長期的隨訪去驗(yàn)證。近年精準(zhǔn)醫(yī)學(xué)被重視,基因組學(xué)、蛋白質(zhì)組學(xué)等多種技術(shù)平臺(tái)逐漸應(yīng)用于生物標(biāo)志物的研究,這也給發(fā)現(xiàn)有價(jià)值的生物標(biāo)志物帶來了契機(jī)。
[1]Bryson T,Sundaram B,Khanna D,et al.Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Pneumonia and Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia:Similarity and Difference[J].Semin Ultrasound CT MR,2014,35:29-38.
[2]Wells AU,Denton CP.Interstitial lung disease in connective tissue disease—mechanisms and management[J].Nat Rev Rheumatol,2014,10:728-739.
[3]Travis WD,Costabel U,Hansell DM,et al.An official American Thoracic SocietyEuropean Respiratory Society statement:Update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2013,188:733-748.
[4]Bonella F,Costabel U.Biomarkers in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease[J].Semin Respir Crit Care Med,2014,35:181-200.
[5]Elhaj M,Charles J,Pedroza C,et al.Can Serum Surfactant Protein D or CC-Chemokine Ligand 18 Predict Outcome of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients with Early Systemic Sclerosis?[J].J Rheumatol,2013,40:1114-1120.
[6]Takahashi H,Kuroki Y,Tanaka H,et al.Serum levels of surfactant proteins A and D are useful biomarkers for interstitial lung disease in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2000,162:258-263.
[7]Arai S,Kurasawa K,Maezawa R,et al.Marked increase in serum KL- 6 and surfactant protein D levels during the first 4 weeks after treatment predicts poor prognosis in patients with active interstitial pneumonia associated with polymyositisdermatomyositis[J].Mod Rheumatol,2013,23:872- 883.
[8]Kumanovics G,Gorbe E,Minier T,et al.Follow-up of serum KL- 6 lung fibrosis biomarker levels in 173 patients with systemic sclerosis[J].Clin Exp Rheumatol,2014,32:138-144.
表2 CTD-ILD相關(guān)的主要生物標(biāo)志物Table 2 Key biomarkers related to CTD-ILD
DLCO:一氧化碳彌散量;FVC:用力肺活量;PFT:肺功能檢測(cè);TLC:肺總量;6MWT:6分鐘步行試驗(yàn);CTD-ILD:結(jié)締組織病-間質(zhì)性肺病;SSc:硬皮病;DM:多發(fā)性肌炎;RA:類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎;MCTD:混合性結(jié)締組織炎;BALF:支氣管肺泡灌洗液
[9]Hesselstrand R,Wildt M,Bozovic G,et al.Biomarkers from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in systemic sclerosis patients with interstitial lung disease relate to severity of lung fibrosis[J].Respir Med,2013,107:1079-1086.[10] Oyama T,Kohno N,Yokoyama A,et al.Detection of interstitial pneumonitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by measuring circulating levels of KL- 6,a human MUC1 mucin[J].Lung,1997,175:379-385.
[11] Fathi M,Barbasso Helmers S,Lundberg IE.KL- 6:a serological biomarker for interstitial lung disease in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis[J].J Intern Med,2012,271:589-597.
[12] Giles JT,Danoff SK,Sokolove J,et al.Association of fine specificity and repertoire expansion of anticitrullinated peptide antibodies with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease[J].Ann Rheum Dis,2014,73:1487-1494.
[13] Cruellas M,Viana V,Levy-Neto M,et al.Myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibody profiles and their clinical associations in a large series of patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis[J].Clinics (Sao Paulo),2013,68:909-914.
[14] de Souza F,Cruellas M,Levy-Neto M,et al.Anti-synthetase syndrome:anti-PL-7,anti-PL-12 and anti-EJ[J].Rev Bras Reumatol,2013,53:352-357.
[15] Hamaguchi Y,F(xiàn)ujimoto M,Matsushita T,et al.Common and distinct clinical features in adult patients with anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibodies:heterogeneity within the syndrome[J].PLoS One,2013,8:e60442.
[16] Schneider F,Yousem SA,Bi D,et al.Pulmonary pathologic manifestations of anti-glycyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-EJ)-related inflammatory myopathy[J].J Clin Pathol,2014,67:678- 683.
[17] Aggarwal R,Cassidy E,F(xiàn)ertig N,et al.Patients with non-Jo-1 anti-tRNA-synthetase autoantibodies have worse survival than Jo-1 positive patients[J].Ann Rheum Dis,2013,73:227-232.
[18] Sato S,Kuwana M,F(xiàn)ujita T,et al.Anti-CADM-140MDA5 autoantibody titer correlates with disease activity and predicts disease outcome in patients with dermatomyositis and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease[J].Mod Rheumatol,2013,23:496-502.
[19] Kelly CA,Saravanan V,Nisar M,et al.Rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease:associations,prognostic factors and physiological and radiological characteristics-a large multicentre UK study[J].Rheumatology (Oxford),2014,53:1676-1682.
[20] Harlow L,Gochuico BR,Rosas IO,et al.Anti-citrullinated heat shock protein 90 antibodies identified in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid are a marker of lung-specific immune responses[J].Clin Immunol,2014,155:60-70.
[21] Chen J,Ascherman DP.Peripheral blood biomarkers of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease[J].Arthritis Rheumatol,2013,6510:S174.
[22] Manetti M,Guiducci S,Romano E,et al.Increased serum levels and tissue expression of matrix metalloproteinase-12 in patients with systemic sclerosis:correlation with severity of skin and pulmonary fibrosis and vascular damage[J].Ann Rheum Dis,2012,71:1064-1072.
[23] Oka S,F(xiàn)urukawa H,Shimada K,et al.Serum biomarker analysis of collagen disease patients with acute-onset diffuse interstitial lung disease[J].BMC Immunol,2013,14:9.
[24] Taniguchi T,Asano Y,Akamata K,et al.Serum levels of ADAM12-S:possible association with the initiation and progression of dermal fibrosis and interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis[J].J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol,2013,27:747-753.
[25] Schmidt K,Martinez-Gamboa L,Meier S,et al.Bronchoalveoloar lavage fluid cytokines and chemokines as markers and predictors for the outcome of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis patients[J].Arthritis Res Ther,2009,11:R111.
[26] Tiev KP,Hua-Huy T,Kettaneh A,et al.Serum CC chemokine ligand-18 predicts lung disease worsening in systemic sclerosis[J].Eur Respir J,2011,38:1355-1360.
[27] Antonelli A,F(xiàn)erri C,F(xiàn)allahi P,et al.CXCL10 (α) and CCL2 (β) chemokines in systemic sclerosis a longitudinal study[J].Rheumatology (Oxford),2008,47:45- 49.
[28] Tourkina E,Bonner M,Oates J,et al.Altered monocyte and fibrocyte phenotype and function in scleroderma interstitial lung disease:reversal by caveolin-1 scaffolding domain peptide[J].Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair,2011,4:15.
[29] van Bon L,Affandi AJ,Broen J,et al.Proteome-wide Analysis and CXCL4 as a biomarker in systemic sclerosis[J].N Engl J Med,2014,370:433- 443.
[30] Olewicz-Gawlik A,Danczak-Pazdrowska A,Kuznar-Kaminska B,et al.Interleukin-17 and interleukin-23:importance in the pathogenesis of lung impairment in patients with systemic sclerosis[J].Int J Rheum Dis,2014,17:664- 670.
[31] Gono T,Kaneko H,Kawaguchi Y,et al.Cytokine profiles in polymyositis and dermatomyositis complicated by rapidly progressive or chronic interstitial lung disease[J].Rheumatology (Oxford),2014,53:2196-2203.
[32] Rimar D,Rosner I,Nov Y,et al.Brief report:lysyl oxidase is a potential biomarker of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis[J].Arthritis Rheumatol,2014,66:726-730.
[33] Reese C,Perry B,Heywood J,et al.Caveolin-1 Deficiency May Predispose African Americans to Systemic Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease[J].Arthritis Rheumatol,2014,66:1909-1919.
[35] van Bon L,Cossu M,Loof A,et al.Proteomic analysis of plasma identifies the Toll-like receptor agonists S100A8A9 as a novel possible marker for systemic sclerosis phenotype[J].Ann Rheum Dis,2014,73:1585-1589.
[36] Antonelli A,F(xiàn)allahi P,F(xiàn)errari SM,et al.Systemic sclerosis fibroblasts show specific alterations of interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced modulation of interleukin 6 and chemokine ligand 2[J].J Rheumatol,2012,39:979-985.
[37] De Lauretis A,Sestini P,Pantelidis P,et al.Serum interleukin 6 is predictive of early functional decline and mortality in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis[J].J Rheumatol,2013,40:435- 446.
中華臨床免疫和變態(tài)反應(yīng)雜志2016年2期