Department of Geriatric Pulmonary Diseases, Anhui Geriatric Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China

Corresponding Author:Jiong Wang, Email: wangjiong7286@163.com

Sequential invasive-noninvasive mechanical ventilation weaning strategy for patients after tracheostomy

Xue-xue Pu, Jiong Wang, Xue-bo Yan, Xue-qin Jiang

Department of Geriatric Pulmonary Diseases, Anhui Geriatric Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China

Corresponding Author:Jiong Wang, Email: wangjiong7286@163.com

BACKGROUND:Because the continuity and integrity of the trachea are likely damaged to some extent after tracheostomy, the implementation of sequential ventilation has certain diffi culties, and sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation on patients after tracheostomy is less common in practice. The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility of invasive-noninvasive sequential weaning strategy in patients after tracheostomy.

METHODS:Fifty patients including 24 patients with withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (conventional group) and 26 patients with sequential invasive-noninvasive weaning by directly plugging of tracheostomy (sequential group) were analyzed retrospectively after appearance of pulmonary infection control (PIC) window. The analysis of arterial blood gases, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence, the total duration of mechanical ventilation, the success rate of weaning and total cost of hospitalization were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS:Arterial blood gas analysis showed that the sequential weaning group was better than the conventional weaning group 1 and 24 hours after invasive ventilation. The VAP incidence was lowered, the duration of mechanical ventilation shortened, the success rate of weaning increased, and the total cost of hospitalization decreased.

CONCLUSION:Sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilator weaning is feasible in patients after tracheostomy.

Respiratory failure; Weaning; Tracheostomy; Sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation

INTRODUCTION

The withdrawal of mechanical ventilator is a process of sudden or gradual weaning from supportive ventilation after the improvement or remission of underlying causes of respiratory failure.[1–3]The ultimate purpose of mechanical ventilation is to help the patient achieve independent respiration off the ventilator. Therefore, from the moment a patient with the ventilator on, we must be prepared to create conditions to withdraw the mechanical ventilator early, safely and rapidly.[4–6]But there are few studies to guide the choice of ventilation mode during weaning.[7–9]Sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation is a strategy to undergo noninvasive mechanical ventilation, and gradually weaning to shorten the invasive ventilation time before weaning criteria have not yet reached. Researches on sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation strategy mainly focus on the direct tracheal extubation of patients after their intubation.[10,11]Because the continuity and integrity of the trachea were damaged to some extent after tracheostomy, sequential ventilation has certain difficulties. Sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation of patients after tracheostomy was less common in practice. In this study, we conducted a retrospectiveanalysis of patients who were subjected to weaning from invasive ventilation by directly plugging tracheostomy and with a nasal or full-face mask connected to patients to implement noninvasive ventilation. We investigated the feasibility of invasive-noninvasive sequential weaning in patients after tracheostomy.

METHODS

Patients

In the 50 patients, 36 were male and 14 female. The age of these patients ranged from 54 to 90 years old. They were admitted to our respiratory department between January 1, 2012 and October 31, 2014 because of acute respiratory failure. The patients had acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (37 patients), cerebral vascular accident (8 patients), acute respiratory distress syndrome (3 patients) and severe pneumonia (2 patients). Totally 26 patients were withdrawn from invasive mechanical ventilation by sequential weaning mode, and 24 patients by a conventional weaning approach consisting of daily weaning attempts.

General care

The patients with respiratory failure were subjected to tracheotomy intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. Ventilation modes and parameters included inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2), tidal volume (Vt), positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), respiratory ratio (I:E) and respiratory frequency (f). They were adjusted to achieve the desired levels according to patient situation, ventilation, arterial blood gas analysis. At the same time, the respiratory function of the patients was optimized with the appropriate use of antibiotics, bronchodilators and expectorants as indicated. The management of coexisting medical problems was reviewed, and metabolic abnormalities were corrected. When pulmonary infection control (PIC) window appeared, patients of the sequential weaning group were connected with a nasal or full-face mask to implement noninvasive ventilation by plugging tracheostomy and deflating the cuff directly. The patients of the conventional weaning group received invasive PSV with an initial level of pressure support that was decided on the basis of achieving acceptable arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters, respiratory rates (RR) ＜25/min, and patient's tolerance and comfort. Subsequently, the pressure support was decreased by 2 cmH2O every 4 hours while close monitoring the worsening of oxygen saturation (SaO) and RR. When the pressure support and PEEP reached 10 and 5 cmH2O respectively with satisfactory blood gases and absence of severe dyspnea, patients were weaned and allowed to breathe spontaneously. Weaning success was defi ned as the complete withdrawal of an invasive mechanical ventilator, with or without continuing requirement for a nocturnal noninvasive ventilator.

Collection of data

The changes of arterial blood gases were retrospectively analyzed 1 and 24 hours before and after off invasive ventilation respectively. The incidence of ventilatorassociated pneumonia (VAP), the total duration of mechanical ventilation, the success rate of weaning, and total cost of hospitalization were also analyzed. The various episodes and complications during sequential noninvasive ventilation process were recorded.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS software version 17.0 for Windows, Chicago, IL, USA. Student's t test or the Chi-square test was used between the two groups. Paired t tests were used for data analysis in each group, and measurement data were presented as mean±SD. P＜0.05 was considered statistically signifi cant.

RESULTS

Comparison of data between the two groupsThere were no statistical significant differences in gender, age, primary disease, duration of disease, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) and arterial blood gas analysis before withdrawal of the mechanical ventilator between the two groups (Table 1) (P＞0.05).

Comparison of arterial blood gases between the two groups

PaO2in the sequential weaning group was better than in the conventional weaning group 1 and 24 hours respectively after withdrawal of mechanical ventilation(P＜0.05), whereas pH value and PaCO2were not significantly different between the two groups (P＞0.05) (Table 2). These results indicated that noninvasive mechanical ventilation could maintain respiratory ventilatory function effectively.

Table 1. Comparison of gender, age, duration of disease, RSBI and arterial blood gases between the two groups

Comparison of main medical index between the two groups

The VAP incidence was lowered, the total duration of mechanical ventilation shortened, the success rate of weaning increased, and the cost of hospitalization decreased in the sequential weaning group than in the conventional weaning group (P＜0.05) (Table 3). These results indicated that sequential weaning ventilation is more effective and superior to conventional weaning ventilation.

The main complications seen during sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation included thirsty, diffi cult expectoration of thick sputum, fl atulence, minor facial injury and aspiration.

DISCUSSION

As life-support means, invasive and noninvasive positive pressure ventilations are indispensable and comprehensive measures for critical patients.[12–14]After the establishment of artificial airway, invasive positive pressure ventilation can effectively control hypoxemia and hypercapnia. Moreover it can improve the efficacy of antibiotics by sputum drainage and gain the time for the treatment of primary diseases.[15,16]Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation has undergone a remarkable evolution in the past decade, showing an important role in the management of both acute and chronic respiratory failure. This ventilation can be used as a bridge or reduce the intensity of assisted ventilation and contribute to successful weaning with efficient respiratory support for the improvement of ventilation.[17,18]With the technological development of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and the progress of clinical research, invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation have been closely coordinated.[19,20]In the present study, 80.76% of the patients were successfully weaned using this strategy. It shortened the total mechanical ventilation time, reduced the incidence of VAP, and decreased the cost of hospitalization.

There are two kinds of noninvasive assisted ventilation schemes: one is the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation immediately after the extubation (sequential invasive-noninvasive strategy);[21]the other is the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation when exacerbations of respiratory failure post extubation (noninvasive positive pressure ventilation as remedial strategy).[22]Many studies support the sequential invasive-noninvasive strategy, but researches on sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation strategy mainly focused on the direct tracheal extubation of patients after their intubation. Because of the continuity and integrity of the trachea were subjected to damages to some extent after tracheostomy, sequential ventilation has certain difficulties, and sequential invasivenoninvasive ventilation for patients after tracheostomy was less common in practice. A breakthrough was made in the mode noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in our study. When the pulmonary infection control window appeared, we connected the patients with a nasal or full-face mask to implement noninvasive ventilation by deflating the cuff and plugging tracheostomy tubes directly. The advantages of this ventilation are as follows: (1) It can give patients effective breathing support and improve ventilation; (2) If the patient cannot accomplish airway clearance independently and effectively, respiratory secretions can be effectively removed by retained tracheostomy tubes; (3) Once noninvasive ventilation fails, we can immediately and easily re-openthe tracheostomy tubes to implement invasive ventilation for the safety of patients.

Table 2. Comparison of arterial blood gases

Table 3. Comparison of main medical indexes

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation may fail because the continuity and integrity of the trachea were damaged to some extent after tracheostomy, the missing of air from the tracheal cut, the occupation of airway space by the tracheostomy tube and deflated cuff. In this study, we found that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation can be accomplished by deflating the cuff and plugging the tracheostomy tubes directly, even if the patients had not yet completely recovered from sputum clearance ability. Quinnell et al[23]reported that a specialist weaning service using noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for patients requiring prolonged invasive ventilation after recovery from acute illness could be successful in weaning most COPD patients from prolonged invasive ventilation. Song et al[24]implemented sequential invasive to noninvasive ventilation by plugging tracheostomy tubular sinus directly or replacement for silver metal tubes plugged and demonstrated that it could improve the success rate of weaning, shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, reduce expenses of hospitalization as well. These results showed a promising clinical application of sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation strategy. We therefore suggest that tracheostomy tube should be designed with a cap-like accessory which will make it more convenient to switch invasive to noninvasive ventilation by plugging the tracheal tube. Though the similar cap had existed for decades and widely used by patients on fenestrated tracheostomy tubes. But its use in non-fenestrated trachesotomy tube was not approved by regulating bodies. The mode of sequential invasivenoninvasive mechanical ventilation weaning strategy on patients with tracheostomy provided an applicable alternative.

The successful implementation of sequential invasive to noninvasive ventilation depends on the accurate hold of switching point. Premature decision of switching may lead patients to experience relapses, but if you were asleep at the switching point, the patients may suffer from ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator dependence and failure of treatment. Many researchers[25–28]have tested spontaneous breathing trial, heart-rate variability and the pulmonary infection control window as weaning time. In our study, we applied the pulmonary infection control window as the critical switching point. At this time, sputum expectoration markedly reduced, severe respiratory failure was corrected, but there were somewhat respiratory muscle fatigue and respiratory dynamic abnormality.[29,30]Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation is more conducive to the recovery of respiratory muscle fatigue.[31]Luo et al[32]provide experimental evidence that most AECOPD patients can breathe independently at the pulmonary infection control window, but develop respiratory distress and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is required after extubation. The major complications in the process of sequential invasive-noninvasive ventilation are thirsty and diffi culty in expectoration of thick sputum, fl atulence, facial injury and mis-aspiration. These complications may be ascribed to improper use of noninvasive ventilator, bad choice of nasal or full-face mask and intensive care unit acquired weakness. The symptoms of these complications can be ameliorated after corresponding treatment. This study demonstrates that the method is safe and reliable and can be used extensively in clinical practice. Since the study included a limited number of cases, larger sample size studies are needed to confi rm the conclusion.

Funding:This study was supported by the fund for clinical research project (2015xkj086).

Ethical approval:The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Conflicts of interest:The authors declare that there is no competing interest and nor personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately infl uence their work.

Contributors:Pu XX proposed the study and wrote the fi rst draft. All authors read and approved the fi nal manuscript.

1 Navalesi P, Frigerio P, Patzlaff A, H?u?ermann S, Henseke P, Kubitschek M. Prolonged weaning: from the intensive care unit to home. Rev Port Pneumol 2014; 5: 264–272.

2 Hsu JC, Chung WS, Tan TH, Chen T, Chiang JY. Clinical verification of a clinical decision support system for ventilator weaning. Biomed Eng Online 2013; 12 Suppl 1: S4.

3 Cordeiro de Souza L, Campos JF, Daher LP, Furtado da Silva P, Ventura A, do Prado PZ, et al. Mechanical ventilation weaning in inclusion body myositis: feasibility of isokinetic inspiratory muscle training as an adjunct therapy. Case Rep Crit Care 2014; 902541.

4 Tarpgaard M, Rasmussen BS. Weaning from mechanical ventilation is an important part of the ventilation process. Ugeskr Laeger 2014; 176: V10130578.

5 Kirakli C, Ediboglu O, Naz I, Cimen P, Tatar D. Effectiveness and safety of a protocolized mechanical ventilation and weaning strategy of COPD patients by respiratory therapists. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6: 1180–1186.

6 Muttini S, Villani PG, Trimarco R, Bellani G, Grasselli G, Patroniti N. Relation between peak and integral of the diaphragmelectromyographic activity at different levels of support during weaning from mechanical ventilation: A physiologic study. J Crit Care 2014; S0883–9441: 342–346.

7 Spieth PM, Gama de Abreu M. Approaches to ventilation in intensive care. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 714–720.

8 Blackwood B, Burns KE, Cardwell CR, O'Halloran P. Protocolized versus non-protocolized weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 6: CD006904.

9 Esquinas AM. Weaning method from mechanical ventilation, more computer or clinical perspective: who is helping whom truly? Chin Med J (Engl) 2014; 16: 3036.

10 Mishra M, Chaudhri S, Tripathi V, Verma AK, Sampath A, Chauhan NK. Weaning of mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients by using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation: A prospective study. Lung India 2014; 2: 127–133.

11 Prasad SB, Chaudhry D, Khanna R. Role of noninvasive ventilation in weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an Indian experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2009; 13: 207–212.

12 Yan HY, Yang Y, Wu YL. Clinical analysis of optimal timing for application of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in treatment of AECOPD patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2014; 18: 2176–2181.

13 Yaman A, Kendirli T, ?dek ?, Karadeniz C, U?ar T, G?llü G, et al. Successful noninvasive mechanical ventilation in a child on prolonged and life-threatening invasive mechanical ventilation after Fontan operation. Turk J Pediatr 2014; 1: 111–114.

14 Carron M, Rossi S, Carollo C, Ori C. Comparison of invasive and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation delivered by means of a helmet for weaning of patients from mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care 2014; 29: 580–585.

15 van Hoorn J, Brouwers A, Griese M, Kramer B. Successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in a patient with surfactant protein C defi ciency presenting with severe neonatal respiratory distress. BMJ Case Rep 2014; 3: 203053.

16 Macintyre NR, Nava S, Diblasi RM, Restrepo RD, Hess DR. Respiratory care year in review 2010: part 2. Invasive mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, pediatric mechanical ventilation, aerosol therapy. Respir Care 2011; 5: 667–680.

17 Lin C, Yu H, Fan H, Li Z. The effi cacy of noninvasive ventilation in managing postextubation respiratory failure: a meta-analysis. Heart Lung 2014; 2: 99–104.

18 Karcz MK, Papadakos PJ. Noninvasive ventilation in trauma. World J Crit Care Med 2015; 4: 47–54.

19 Ferrer M, Torres A. Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21: 1–6.

20 Burns KE, Meade MO, Premji A, Adhikari NK. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 12: CD004127.

21 Nava S, Ambrosino N, Clini E, Prato M, Orlando G, Vitacca M, et al. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in the weaning of patients with respiratory failure due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998; 9: 721–728.

22 Ferrer M, Esquinas A, Arancibia F, Bauer TT, Gonzalez G, Carrillo A, et al. Noninvasive ventilation during persistent weaning failure: a randomized controlled trail. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 1: 70–76.

23 Quinnell TG, Pilsworth S, Shneerson JM, Smith IE. Prolonged invasive ventilation following acute ventilatory failure in COPD: weaning results, survival, and the role of noninvasive ventilation. Chest 2006; 1: 133–139.

24 Song RR, Qiu YP, Chen YJ, Ji Y. Application of fiberoptic bronchscopy in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during sequential weaning of invasive-noninvasive mechanical ventilation. World J Emerg Med 2012; 3: 29–34.

25 Moschietto S, Doyen D, Grech L, Dellamonica J, Hyvernat H, Bernardin G. Transthoracic Echocardiography with Doppler Tissue Imaging predicts weaning failure from mechanical ventilation: evolution of the left ventricle relaxation rate during a spontaneous breathing trial is the key factor in weaning outcome. Crit Care 2012; 3: R81.

26 Huang CT, Tsai YJ, Lin JW, Ruan SY, Wu HD, Yu CJ. Application of heart-rate variability in patients undergoing weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2014; 1: R21.

27 Collaborating Research Group for Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation of Chinese Respiratory Society. Pulmonary infection control window in treatment of severe respiratory failure of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases: a prospective, randomized controlled, multi-centred study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2005; 19: 1589–1594.

28 Walsh TS, Dodds S, McArdle F. Evaluation of simple criteria to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care patients. Br J Anaesth 2004; 6: 793–799.

29 Kallet RH. Patient-ventilator interaction during acute lung injury, and the role of spontaneous breathing: part 1: respiratory muscle function during critical illness. Respir Care 2011; 2: 181–189.

30 Carlucci A, Ceriana P, Prinianakis G, Fanfulla F, Colombo R, Nava S. Determinants of weaning success in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2009; 13: R97.

31 Kiser TH, Vandivier RW. Severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does the dosage of corticosteroids and type of antibiotic matter? Curr Opin Pulm Med 2015; 21: 142–148.

32 Luo Z, Zhan Q, Wang C. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is required following extubation at the pulmonary infection control window: a prospective observational study. Clin Respir J 2014; 3: 338–349.

Received February 12, 2015

Accepted after revision June 28, 2015

10.5847/wjem.j.1920–8642.2015.03.006

World J Emerg Med 2015;6(3):196–200