ZHANG Hi-Feng CHEN Yn-Mei QIN Y-Ru LI Y-Hong LI Wu

?

CuIIand CuIComplexes of 1,1?-(Pyridin-2-ylmethylene)- bis[3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-]pyridine]:Generation of the Ligand via Acetic Acid-controlled Metal-ligand Reactions①

ZHANG Hai-FengaCHEN Yan-MeiaQIN Ya-RuaLI Ya-Honga②LI Wub

a(215123)b(810008)

Reaction of 3-(pyridin-2-yl)-imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine (HPIP), CuCl2·2H2O and picolinaldehyde in the mixture of CH3COOH and EtOH under solvothermal conditions gave complexes [LCuCl][Cu2Cl3] (1) and [HLCuCl]2[CuCl2]2[CuCl3]·2H2O (2) (L = 1,1?-(pyridin-2- ylmethylene)bis[3-(pyridin-2-yl)imidazo[1,5-]pyridine]) simultaneously. The ligand L was generated viametal-ligand reaction between HPIP and picolinaldehyde. When CuCl2·2H2O was replaced by CuCl, the 2:1:1 (HPIP:picolinaldehyde:CuCl) reaction afforded complex [Cu3L2Cl2][CuCl2]·2H2O (3) and the analogous 2:1:3 reaction generated compound [Cu3L2][CuCl2]3(4). Complexes 1 and 2 are CuII/CuImixed-valence compounds. Complexes 1～4display four various structures. It is found that the formation of the L ligand is controlled by CH3COOH. This work reveals that the structures of complexes 1～4 could be rationally tuned via the inclusion of CH3COOH in the reaction systems, the proper selection of different starting materials and the dexterous adjustment of the ratio of the starting materials.

Imidazo[1,5-]pyridine, coordination chemistry, CuIIcomplex;

1 INTRODUCTION

Imidazo[1,5-]pyridine and its derivatives, as a class of important ligand, have attracted con- siderable attention of coordination chemists because these ligands and their coordination complexes have extensive applications in medicine[1-3], OLEDs[4, 5]and photoluminescent materials[6-8]. Despite all these interests, only few complexes have been reported due to the strict reaction conditions and length sequence required for the synthesis of imidazo[1,5-]pyridine and its derivatives. Hence, the develop- ment of efficient access to the ligands as well as compounds is of great significance.

In our previous work[9], we report an efficient strategy for the preparation of coordination com- plexes of imidazo[1,5-]pyridine and its derivatives. By employing this strategy, a variety of derivatives of imidazo[1,5-]pyridine were generated via metal- ligand reactions among picolinaldehyde, ammonium acetate and metal salts. The mechanism investigation revealed that the free radicals were formed in the reaction process. We envisioned that there might be a number of new complexes available by adding acetic acid in the reaction system because acetic acid could sever as a radical inhibitor in some reac- tions[10].

To this end, we conducted the reactions of HPIP (HPIP = 3-(pyridin-2-yl)-imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine), picolinaldehyde and CuCl2·2H2O (or CuCl) in the presence of acetic acid under solvothermal condi- tions. Four complexes of formulas [LCuCl][Cu2Cl3] (1), [HLCuCl]2[CuCl2]2[CuCl3]·2H2O (2), [Cu3L2Cl2] [CuCl2]·2H2O] (3) and [Cu3L2][CuCl2]3(4) were prepared. Complexes 1 and 2 are CuII/CuImixed- valence compounds. Herein, we report the syntheses and structures of these complexes.

2 EXPERIMENTAL

All solvents and reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification.Crystal determinations of complexes 1～4 were performed with a Bruker SMART APEXⅡ CCD diffractometer equipped with a graphite-monochromatized Moradiation (= 0.71073 ?). Elemental analyses (C, N, H) were performed with a Carlo-Erba EA1110 CHNO-S elemental analyzer. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was recorded on a Rigaku D/Max-2500 diffractiometer.IR spectra (4000～400 cm-1) were recorded by using KBr pellets with a Nicolet MagNa-TR500 FT-IR spectrometer.

2. 1 Syntheses of complexes 1 and 2

A mixture of HPIP (0.0390 g, 0.2 mmol), picolinaldehyde (0.0214 g, 0.2 mmol), CuCl2·2H2O (0.0524 g, 0.3 mmol), CH3COOH (1 mL) and EtOH (2 mL) was sealed in an 8 mL Pyrex tube and heated for 72 h at 125 ℃ under autogenous pressure. Dark- green block crystals [LCuCl][Cu2Cl3] (1) and green rod crystals [HLCuCl]2[CuCl2]2[CuCl3]·2H2O (2) were obtained simultaneously. The crystals were collected by filtration, washed with Et2O (2×3 mL), and dried in air. Yield: 19% (based on CuCl2·2H2O).

Elemental Anal. Calcd. for C30H21Cl4Cu3N7(1): C, 44.38; H, 2.61; N, 12.07%. Found: C, 43.85; H, 2.44; N 11.97%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 2361 (w), 1639 (w), 1602 (m), 1481 (s), 1371 (m), 1311 (m), 1255 (m), 1146 (m), 1053 (w), 1005 (w), 983 (w), 781 (m), 738 (m), 678 (m).

Elemental Anal. Calcd. for C60H48Cl9Cu5N14O2(2): C, 44.11; H, 2.96; N, 12.00%. Found: C, 43.34; H, 2.67; N, 11.73%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 1606 (m), 1519 (w), 1495 (s), 1367 (m), 1315 (m), 1252 (m), 1071 (w), 1008 (w), 774 (s), 750 (m), 697 (m).

2. 2 Synthesis of complex 3

A mixture of HPIP (0.0390 g, 0.2 mmol), pico- linaldehyde (0.0214 g, 0.1 mmol), CuCl (0.0099 g, 0.1 mmol), CH3COOH (1 mL) and EtOH (2 mL) was sealed in an 8 mL Pyrex tube. The tube was heated for three days at 125 ℃ under autogenous pressure. Slow cooling of the resultant solution to room temperature over 24 h gave orange-block crystals. The crystals were collected by filtration, washed with Et2O (23 mL), and dried in air. Yield: 34% (based on CuCl).

Elemental anal. calcd. for C60H46Cl4Cu4N14O2: C, 51.80; H, 3.33; N, 14.10%. Found: C, 51.34; H, 3.41; N 13.95%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 3463 (s), 3423 (s), 2361 (w), 1637 (w), 1594 (w), 1473 (w), 1438 (w), 1150 (w), 774 (m), 723 (w), 618 (w).

2. 3 Synthesis of complex 4

A mixture of HPIP (0.0390 g, 0.2 mmol), pico- linaldehyde (0.0214 g, 0.1 mmol), CuCl (0.0297 g, 0.3 mmol), CH3COOH (1 mL) and EtOH (2 mL) was sealed in an 8 mL Pyrex tube. The tube was heated for three days at 125 ℃ under autogenous pressure. Slow cooling of the resultant solution to room temperature over 24 h gave red-platy crystals. The crystals were collected by filtration, washed with Et2O (23 mL), and dried in air. Yield: 29% (based on CuCl). Elemental anal. calcd. for C60H42Cl6Cu6N14: C, 46.40; H, 2.73; N, 12.63%. Found: C, 46.72; H, 2.67; N, 12.21%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1): 3446 (s), 1635 (w), 1590 (m), 1478 (s), 1359 (w), 1312 (w), 1236 (w), 1070 (w), 1002 (w), 778 (m), 735 (w), 619 (w).

2. 4 Single-crystal X-ray crystallography

Data were collected at 296(2) Kon a Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer equipped with a graphite-monochromated Moradiation (= 0.71073 ?) for 1～4 using the-scan technique. The structures were solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97[11]and refined on2using full-matrix least-squares with SHELXL-97[12]. Crystallographic data together with refinement details for the new complexes reported in this work are summarized in Table 1. Selected bond lengths and bond angles of 1～4 are shown in Table 2, and hydrogen bond lengths and bond angles are listed in Table 3.

Table 1. Crystal Data and Structure Refinement for Complexes 1～4

Table 2. Selected Bond Lengths (?) and Bond Angles (°) for 1～4

Symmetry transformation: (1) #1:, –+1/2,; #2:–1,,; (2) #1: –+1, –,

Table 3. Selected Hydrogen Bond Lengths (?) and Bond Angles (°) for 1～4

Symmetry codes: (1) #1: –, 1/2+, 1–; #2: –1+,,; #3: 1–, 1/2+, 1–; #4: –1/2+, 1/2–, 1/2–; (2) #1: 3/4–, 1/4+, 3/4+;#2: –1/4+, 1/4–, –1/4+; #3: –, –,; #4:,, –1+; #5: 1/4+, 1/4–, 1/4+; #6: 1/4+, –1/4–, –1/4+; (3)#1:, 1+,;#2: 1–,1–,–; #3: –1+,1+,; #4: 1–,–,1–; (4) #1:, 1+,; #2: 1–, 1–, 1–; #3: –, 1–, 1–; #4:1–, 1–, –

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3. 1 Synthesis

In our previous work[9], we have conducted the reactions of HPIP, picolinaldehyde and CuCl2·2H2O in EtOH. Three complexes have been produced via solvothermal in situ metal-ligand reactions. The radical mechanisms are proved for these reactions. It is well known that acetic acid could serve as an inhibitor for radical reactions[10]. We were curious if thegeneration of the ligand through metal- ligand reaction could occur again in the presence of acetic acid. To our delight, the solvothermal metal- ligand reaction was determined, and the ligand L (L = 1,1?-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)bis[3-(pyridin-2-yl)imi-dazo[1,5-]pyridine) was generated again (Scheme 1). The reaction of HPIP, picolinaldehyde and CuCl2·2H2O gave crystals 1 and 2 simultaneously. The color of crystal 1 is dark green, while that of crystal 2 is green-rod. They are easy to distinguish.

Intrigued by the above work, we are eager to know if other new complexes could be obtained when CuCl2·2H2O is replaced by CuCl. Two reac- tions were examined. The 2:1:1 (HPIP:picolinal- dehyde:CuCl) reaction in the mixture of EtOH and acetic acid gave orange-block crystals 3.If the ratio of HPIP, picolinaldehyde and CuCl is 2:3:1, red-platy crystals of 4 were generated.

It is possible that acetic acid plays two roles in the reactions. First, it acts as a radical inhibitor, pre- venting the further reduction of aldehyde group and the formation of tertiary carbon centers[10]. Secondly, it serves as an acid to facilitate the condensation reaction between HPIP and picoli-naldehyde.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of the L ligand

3. 2 Structure description

The collected crystal data for the four structures are shown in Table 1. Selected bond lengths and bond angles of complexes 1～4 are listed in Table 2. Selected hydrogen bond lengths and bond angles for 1～4 are summarized in Table 3.

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction reveals that 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system ofspace group. It displays a 1D chain structure. The asymmetric unit of 1 is shown in Fig. 1. The 1D and 2D networks of 1 are displayed in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The asymmetric unit of 1 consists of one CuIIion (Cu(1)), two CuIions (Cu(2),Cu(3)), one L ligand and four Cl-ions. Theformed L ligand coordinates to two Cu ions by five nitrogen atoms. The Cu(1) ion is five-coordinated by four nitrogen atoms (N(1), N(2), N(1A), N(2A)) origina- ting from two PIP units of the L ligand and one Cl-ion (Cl(3B)). The Cu(2) ion is bound to one nitrogen atom (N(4)) from pyridine unit of the L ligand and three Cl-anions (Cl(1), Cl(2), Cl(2A)), and Cu(3) is coordinated by three Cl-anions (Cl(2), Cl(3), Cl(2A)).The two adjacent Cu(2) and Cu(3) ions were doubly bridged by two Cl-anions (Cl(2), Cl(2A)), and Cu(1) and Cu(3) were bridged by one Cl-anion (Cl(3B)), forming a 1-D chain structure.

Fig. 1. Partially labeled plot of the asymmetric unit of 1 with H atoms being omitted for clarity

Fig. 2. 1D chain structure of 1 with H atoms being omitted for clarity

Fig. 3. 2D structure created by intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions. Hydrogen atoms which are not involved in hydrogen bonds are omitted for clarity

Complex 1 features intermolecular C–H···Cl hy- drogen bonding contacts between the C–H of pyri- dine rings as hydrogen atom donors, and Cl atoms coordinated to Cu ions as acceptors (C(8)– H(8)···Cl(3), C(3)–H(3)···Cl(2)). These intermole- cular hydrogen bonds connect the 1-D chains to generate an infinite 2-D network.

Complex 1 joins a big family of Cu chain com- plexes[13-15]. However, such examples that use Cl-ions as single or double bridges are very rare[16].

Compound 2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic crystal system of2 space group. Fig. 4 gives a perspective view of 2. Compound 2 consists of one CuIIion (Cu(1)), two CuIions (Cu(2), Cu(3)), oneformed L ligand, five Cl-ions and one solvent water molecule. The central copper(II) ion is coordinated by four N atoms from anformed L ligand and one Cl-ion. Interestingly, there is one hydrogen atom that bonds to N(6) to balance the negative charge. The [CuCl3]2-unit and [CuCl2]-moiety are located around the [Cu(HL)Cl]2+unit to balance the charge of the molecule.

Fig. 4. Molecular structure of 2. Hydrogen atoms and water molecules are omitted for clarity

Strong intermolecularstacking interactions exist in the structure (Fig. 5a). Beside theinteraction, the molecules are also linked to each other by three different hydrogen bonding interac- tions, namely, O(1)–H(1A)…Cl(1) (the oxygen atom O(1) from water molecule as a donor and the chloride atom Cl(1) as an acceptor), C(3)– H(3)…Cl(3) (the carbon atom C(3) as a donor and chloride atom Cl(3) from the [CuCl2] unit as an acceptor), and the other five C–H…Cl interactions (Table 3). An infinite 3-D structure is generated by these hydrogen bonding interactions (Fig. 5b).

(a)

(b)

Fig. 5. (a) Intermolecularstacking interactions found in 2. (b) 3D structure created by intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions. Hydrogen atoms involved in hydrogen bonds are omitted for clarity

X-ray single-crystal diffraction determination indicates that complex 3 crystallizes in the triclinic crystal system ofspace group. Its structure is comprised of one [Cu3L2Cl2]+unit, one [CuCl2]-unit and two water molecules. The coordination environ- ments of three Cu atoms are shown in Fig. 6. Cu(1) atom is coordinated by two N atoms from one L ligand and another two N atoms from another L ligand to generate a distorted tetrahedral coordina- tion environment. Cu(2) and Cu(3) ions have similar coordination environments. They are coordinated by two N atoms from one L ligand and one Cl-ion to form a triangular geometry. The [CuCl2]-unit is located around the [Cu3L2Cl2]+unit to balance the charge of the molecule.

Fig. 6. Structure of 3. Hydrogen atoms and water molecules are omitted for clarity

The hydrogen bond interactions are found between the adjacent units and solvent water mole- cules (Fig. 7). These hydrogen bonds connect the units to afford a 2D framework structure.

Fig. 7. 2D structure created by intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions. Hydrogen atoms which are not involved in hydrogen bonds are omitted for clarity

Complex 4 crystallizes in the triclinic system, space group. Its structure consists of three crystallographically independent Cu+cations, twoformed L ligand, and three [CuCl2]-units. The copper atoms in [Cu3L2]3+unit exhibit two different coordination geometries. The Cu(1) ion is coor- dinated by four nitrogen atoms from two PIP units to give rise to a tetrahedral coordination environment, as shown in Fig. 8. The coordination environments of Cu(2) and Cu(3) are the same. They are both three coordinated by three nitrogen atoms from the L ligand.

The intermolecularstacking interactions are found between the adjacent units (Fig. 9). Beside these π-π stacking interactions, hydrogen bonds are also found between the adjacent units and [CuCl2]-moiety (Fig. 9). All these weak interactions connect the asymmetric units to give a 3D framework structure.

Fig. 8. Structure of 4. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity

(a)????????????(b)

Fig. 9. (a) Intermolecular π···π stacking interactions found in 4. (b) 3D structure created by intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions. Hydrogen atoms which are not involved in hydrogen bonds are omitted for clarity

Complex 4 was formed by slightly adjusting the ratio of the reactants of 3. However, the structures of complexes 3 and 4 were totally different, demons- trating the synthetic novelty of this work.

Complexes 3 and 4 are the members of a great family oftrinuclear copper complexes[17-19]. The triangle topology is a common conformation of trinuclear copper complexes, whereas the linear configuration of Cu3 complexes is not common.

4 CONCLUSION

In summary, we have prepared four new com- plexes via solvothermalmetal ligand reac- tions in the presence of CH3COOH. It is believed CH3COOH plays a key role in forming complexes 1～4. This work demonstrates that the structures of 1～4 could be rationally tuned via the proper selection of different starting materials and dexterous adjustment of the ratio of the starting materials. We are currently studying the coordination chemistry of imidazo[1,5-]pyridine and its deri- vatives with other metals in the presence of CH3COOH. This work is on-going and will be reported soon.

(1) Siamaki, A. R.; Aradtsen, B. A. A direct, one step synthesis of imidazoles from imines and acid chlorides: a palladium catalyzed multicomponent coupling approach.2006, 128, 6050–6051.

(2) Kanazawa, C.; Kamijo, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Synthesis of imidazoles through the copper-catalyzed cross-cycloaddition between two different isocyanides.2006, 128,10662–10663.

(3) Sharma, G. V. M.; Jyothi, Y.; Sree Lakshmi, P. Efficient room-temperature synthesis of tri- and tetrasubstituted imidazoles catalyzed by ZrCl4.2006, 36, 2991–3000.

(4) Garino, C.; Ruiu, T.; Salassa, L.; Albertino, A.; Volpi, G.; Nervi, C.; Gobetto, R.; Hardcastle, K. I. Spectroscopic and computational study on new blue emitting ReL(CO)3Cl complexes containing pyridylimidazo[1,5-]pyridine ligands.2008, 2008, 3587–3591.

(5) Salassa, L.; Garino, C.; Albertino, A.; Volpi, G.; Nervi, C.; Gobetto, R.; Hardcastle, K. I. Computational and spectroscopic studies of new rhenium(I) complexes containing pyridylimidazo[1,5-]pyridine ligands: charge transfer and dual emission by fine-tuning of excited states.2008, 27, 1427–1435.

(6) Alcarazo, M.; Roseblade, S. J.; Cowley, A. R.; Fernández, R.; Brown, J. M.; Lassaletta, J. M. Imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine: a versatile architecture for stable N-heterocyclic carbenes.2005, 127, 3290–3291.

(7) Tong, Y. P.; Zheng, S. L.; Chen, X. M. Structures, photoluminescence and theoretical studies of two ZnIIcomplexes with substituted 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)benzimidazoles.2005, 2005, 3734–3741.

(8) Eseola, A. O.; Li, W.; Adeyemi, O. G.; Obi-Egbedi, N. O.; Woods, J. A. O. Hemilability of 2-(1-imidazol-2-yl)pyridine and 2-(oxazol-2-yl)pyridine ligands: imidazole and oxazole ring Lewis basicity, Ni(II)/Pd(II) complex structures and spectra.2010, 29, 1891–1901.

(9) Chen, Y. M.; Li, L.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Y. L.; Hu, H. L.; Chen, W. Q.; Liu, W.; Li, Y. H.; Lei, T.; Cao, Y. Y.; Kang, Z. H.; Lin, M. S.; Li, W. Metal-mediated controllable creation of secondary, tertiary, and quaternary carbon centers: a powerful strategy for the synthesis of iron, cobalt, and copper complexes with in situ generated substituted 1-pyridineimidazo[1,5-]pyridine ligands.2012, 51, 9705–9713.

(10) Roy, M.; Chakravarthi, B. V. S. K.; Jayabaskaran, C.; Karande, A. A.; Chakravarty, A. R. Impact of metal binding on the antitumor activity and cellular imaging of a metal chelator cationic imidazopyridine derivative.2011,40, 4855–4864.

(11) Sheldrick, G. M.. University of G?ttingen, Germany 1997.

(12) Sheldrick, G. M.,. University of G?ttingen, Germany1997.

(13) Escuer, A.; Vicente, R.; EI Fallah, M. S.; Goher, M. A. S.; Mautner, F. A. Synthesis and structural characterization of the one-dimensional [Cu(3-Clpy)2(N3)2]complex (3-Clpy = 3-Chloropyridine): a singular ferrimagnetic chain with localA=B.1998, 37, 4466–4469.

(14) Li, B. L.; Xu, Z.; Cao, Z. B.; Zhu, L. M.; Yu, K. B. One-dimensional chain copper complexes [Cu(dien)(btrz)(ClO4)2] and [Cu(en)2(btrz)(ClO4)2] based on the bridging ligand 1,2-bis(1,2,4-triazole-1-yl)ethane (btrz).1999, 24, 622–627.

(15) Li, L. C.; Liao, D. Z.; Liu, S. Y.; Jiang, Z. H.; Yan, S. P. A one-dimensional chain compound [Cu(im2-py)(SCN)2]exhibiting strong ferromagnetic coupling.2003, 6, 225–228.

(16) Song, J. L.; Dong, Z. C.; Zeng, H. Y.; Zhou, W. B.; Naka, T.; Wei, Q.; Mao, J. G.; Guo, G. C.; Huang, J. S. [Cu(H4C3N2S)Cl2], an unprecedented diazole-bridged one-dimensional copper halide: synthesis, structure, and magnetic properties.2003, 42, 2136–2140.

(17) Joshi, S. A.; Kulkarni, N. D. A new trinuclear Cu(II) complex of inositol as a hydrogelator.2009, 17, 2341–2343.

(18) Driessen, W. L.; Chang, L.; Finazzo, C.; Gorter, S.; Rehorst, D.; Reedijk, J.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L. Two pyrazolato-bridged, linear trinuclear Cu(II) complexes. Crystal structures and magnetic properties.2003, 350, 25–31.

(19) Tercero, J.; Diaz, C.; Ribas, J.; Mahia, J.; Maestro, M. A. New oxamato-bridged trinuclear CuII?CuII?CuIIcomplexes with hydrogen-bond supramolecular structures: synthesis and magneto-structural studies.2002, 41, 5373–5381.

① Supported by NNSFC (21272167), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution, and KLSLRC (KLSLRC-KF-13-HX-1)

② Corresponding author. Born in 1968, professor, majoring in organometallic chemistry. E-mail: liyahong@suda.edu.cn

10.14102/j.cnki.0254-5861.2011-0680

10 February 2015; accepted10 July 2015 (CCDC 917331, 917335, 917333 and 917334 for complexes 1～4, respectively)