賴慶權(quán)+莊海南+曾貽彬
[摘要]目的 比較經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)與輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)治療上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石的效果。方法 分析我院2013年3月~2017年3月泌尿外科收治的上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石180例患者的臨床資料,依據(jù)治療措施不同進(jìn)行分組,經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組90例和輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)組90例。觀察兩組患者的手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血量、住院時(shí)間、腎積水緩解率、殘石率、血尿并腎絞痛、輸尿管穿孔發(fā)生率情況。結(jié)果 輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)組患者的手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間均短于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組,術(shù)中出血量少于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組,腎積水緩解率低于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。兩組患者的殘石率、血尿并腎絞痛、輸尿管穿孔發(fā)生率差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。結(jié)論 輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)治療上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石手術(shù)時(shí)間短、創(chuàng)傷小,但是其腎積水緩解率低于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù),應(yīng)針對患者的臨床特點(diǎn),選擇有效的手術(shù)措施。
[關(guān)鍵詞]經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù);輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù);上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石
[中圖分類號] R693+.4 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼] A [文章編號] 1674-4721(2017)12(a)-0058-03
[Abstract]Objective To compare the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi.Methods Clinical data of 180 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi treated in urology department of Quanzhou Southeast Hospital from March 2013 to March 2017 was analyzed.According to different treatment measures,90 cases were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (percutaneous nephrolithotomy group) and 90 cases were treated with ureteroscopic lithotripsy (ureteroscopic lithotripsy group).The operation time,blood loss during operation,hospital stay,hydronephrosis remission rate,residual stone rate,the incidence of hematuria combined with renal colic and ureteral perforation in patients of the two groups were observed.Results The operation time,hospital stay in the ureteroscopic lithotripsy group were shorter than those of percutaneous nephrolithotomy group,blood loss during operation was fewer than that of percutaneous nephrolithotomy group,hydronephrosis remission rate in ureteroscopic lithotripsy group was lower than that in percutaneous nephrolithotomy group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in residual stone rate,the incidence of hematuria combined with renal colic and ureteral perforation between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi with shorter operation time,less trauma,but has lower hydronephrosis remission rate than percutaneous nephrolithotomy.So,it should select effective surgical measures according to the clinical characteristics of the patients.
[Key words]Percutaneous nephrolithotomy;Ureteroscopic lithotripsy;Impacted upper ureteral calculi
輸尿管結(jié)石多數(shù)來源于腎臟,20~40歲屬于高發(fā)年齡,男女比例達(dá)到4.5∶1,結(jié)石大多數(shù)是單發(fā),通過體外震波可以促進(jìn)結(jié)石排出,但是輸尿管膀胱壁間段比較狹小,輸尿管結(jié)石容易發(fā)生停留,左右側(cè)輸尿管發(fā)病率相同[1-2]。上段輸尿管結(jié)石發(fā)生率達(dá)到65%以上,臨床上常會出現(xiàn)尿頻、尿急、尿痛,嚴(yán)重者出現(xiàn)腎絞痛、血尿,且伴有惡心嘔吐,繼續(xù)發(fā)展可能造成急性腎功能不全[3-4]。對于一些上段嵌頓性結(jié)石,體外震波治療輸尿管結(jié)石可能無效,需要采取微創(chuàng)性手術(shù)治療[5-6]。隨著泌尿外科技術(shù)的發(fā)展,微創(chuàng)性手術(shù)治療上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石的方法不斷進(jìn)步,但是關(guān)于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)與輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)治療上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石的情況鮮有報(bào)道[7-8]。本研究通過對我院泌尿外科收治的上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石180例患者的臨床資料進(jìn)行分析,探討經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)與輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)治療上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石的臨床效果,現(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。endprint
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
選取我院2013年3月~2017年3月泌尿外科收治的上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石180例患者的臨床資料進(jìn)行分析,依據(jù)治療措施不同進(jìn)行隨機(jī)分組,經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組90例,其中男性55例,女性35例;年齡33~62歲,平均(43.7±13.4)歲;結(jié)石特點(diǎn):單發(fā)性結(jié)石45例,多發(fā)性45例;結(jié)石的橫徑12.7~19.1 mm,平均(16.0±2.4)mm,結(jié)石的縱徑23.6~34.1 mm,平均(29.0±2.7)mm。輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)組90例,其中男性52例,女性38例;年齡33~62歲,平均(43.1±12.2)歲;結(jié)石特點(diǎn):單發(fā)性結(jié)石51例,多發(fā)性39例;結(jié)石的橫徑12.8~19.3 mm,平均(15.5±3.0)mm,結(jié)石的縱徑23.5~35.6 mm,平均(29.2±2.6)mm。納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):兩組患者通過超聲等影像學(xué)診斷確診為復(fù)雜性輸尿管結(jié)石,患側(cè)腎中度以上積水,首先進(jìn)行ESWL治療后結(jié)石未成功排出,結(jié)石和輸尿管之間有粘連、息肉。排出標(biāo)準(zhǔn):輸尿管結(jié)石的橫徑>20 mm,治療前出現(xiàn)發(fā)熱和膿尿癥的臨床表現(xiàn),有部分病例合并輸尿管狹窄或者腎盂輸尿管連接處狹窄。本研究在我院醫(yī)學(xué)倫理委員會批準(zhǔn)下進(jìn)行。兩組患者均知情同意并參與本研究。兩組患者的一般資料差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.2 方法
經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組:上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石患者采取截石位,通過膀胱鏡,放置輸尿管導(dǎo)管在合適的位置,長度為25~30 cm,將生理鹽水持續(xù)從遠(yuǎn)端滴入,建立人工腎盂積水,建立穿刺通道,保持俯臥位,患側(cè)抬高>30°,在超聲引導(dǎo)下通過18G穿刺針進(jìn)行穿刺,如果發(fā)現(xiàn)尿液回流或出現(xiàn)落空感,說明穿刺成功,引入導(dǎo)絲,退出穿刺針,逐步進(jìn)行擴(kuò)張,建立造瘺通道,當(dāng)通道擴(kuò)張到18F,將輸尿管鏡放置其中。沿著導(dǎo)絲引導(dǎo),發(fā)現(xiàn)嵌頓的輸尿管結(jié)石,將激光傳導(dǎo)光纖放置在結(jié)石表面,發(fā)射鈥激光以脈沖的形式碎石,對擊碎的直徑<2 mm的結(jié)石粉末進(jìn)行沖洗,通過鈥激光切除輸尿管肉芽。手術(shù)后注意觀察殘余結(jié)石情況。輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)組:將輸尿管硬鏡經(jīng)過尿道外口放置,探尋患側(cè)輸尿管管口特點(diǎn),將導(dǎo)絲放置其中,進(jìn)輸尿管需要導(dǎo)絲引導(dǎo),側(cè)入法進(jìn)鏡,探查結(jié)石位置,如果發(fā)現(xiàn)結(jié)石,采用鈥激光碎石治療,方法同經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)
1.3.1 兩組患者的手術(shù)情況 主要觀察手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血量、住院時(shí)間。
1.3.2 兩組患者術(shù)后并發(fā)癥情況 主要觀察腎積水緩解率、殘石率,血尿并腎絞痛、輸尿管穿孔發(fā)生率情況。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析
采用統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件SPSS 19.0建立數(shù)據(jù)庫,計(jì)量資料采用t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料采用χ2檢驗(yàn),以P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1 兩組患者手術(shù)情況的比較
輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)組患者的手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間均短于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組,術(shù)中出血量少于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)(表1)。
2.2 兩組患者術(shù)后并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率的比較
輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)組患者的腎積水緩解率低于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),兩組患者的殘石率,血尿并腎絞痛、輸尿管穿孔發(fā)生率差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)(表2)。
3 討論
輸尿管上段結(jié)石是上尿路結(jié)石的一種,其主要治療方法包括體外碎石、經(jīng)過尿道輸尿管碎石、微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮腎鏡碎石[9-10]。內(nèi)鏡技術(shù)近年來獲得了不斷發(fā)展,在臨床被廣泛應(yīng)用,逐步取代了開放式手術(shù)[11-12]。經(jīng)尿道輸尿管鏡碎石或經(jīng)皮腎鏡碎石是臨床治療輸尿管上段結(jié)石的常用方法[13-14]。輸尿管上段結(jié)石治療效率較低于中段、下段結(jié)石,上段輸尿管有一定的活動(dòng)度,如果腎積水或輸尿管擴(kuò)張,很容易引起上段輸尿管扭曲,影響進(jìn)鏡速度,給碎石帶來較大難度[15-16]。
本研究結(jié)果顯示,輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)組患者的手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間均短于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組,術(shù)中出血量少于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組,但是腎積水緩解率低于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)組,提示雖然經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)穿刺建立通道只需要擴(kuò)張到18F,減少了對腎臟的損傷,安全性較好,但是輸尿管鏡下進(jìn)行碎石,其是利用輸尿管生理管道,減少了創(chuàng)傷的侵襲性,提高了手術(shù)效率,縮短了手術(shù)時(shí)間,清除結(jié)石效率較高,對患者的創(chuàng)傷較小,減少了術(shù)中出血量,患者術(shù)后恢復(fù)效率較高,縮短了住院時(shí)間。本研究結(jié)果還顯示,兩組患者的殘石率、血尿并腎絞痛、輸尿管穿孔發(fā)生率差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,提示經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)與輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)治療上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石的安全性均較高,兩組患者的殘石率無明顯差異,說明兩種術(shù)式治療輸尿管結(jié)石的預(yù)后較好,血尿并腎絞痛、輸尿管穿孔發(fā)生率均無明顯差異,進(jìn)一步提示兩種術(shù)式并發(fā)癥相對較少。
綜上所述,輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)治療上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石手術(shù)時(shí)間短、創(chuàng)傷小,但是其腎積水緩解率低于經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù),應(yīng)針對患者的臨床特點(diǎn),選擇有效的手術(shù)措施。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1]陳建剛,陳新鳳,顧棟華,等.微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)對上段輸尿管結(jié)石的治療效果研究[J].航空航天醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2016, 27(7):836-838.
[2]劉升學(xué),孫文國,蔣雷鳴,等.微通道與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)通道經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)治療腎結(jié)石的療效[J].上海醫(yī)學(xué),2013,36(7):898-901.
[3]楊俊,劉璐璐,趙興奇,等.輸尿管鏡鈥激光碎石術(shù)對輸尿管下段結(jié)石致頑固性腎絞痛療效分析[J].浙江臨床醫(yī)學(xué),2015,17(8):1386-1387.
[4]彭偉,李輝明,王進(jìn),等.輸尿管鏡鈥激光碎石術(shù)治療輸尿管上段結(jié)石106例臨床分析[J].中國臨床研究,2013,26(12):1335-1336.
[5]閉克明.氣腹、免氣腹后腹腔鏡手術(shù)治療輸尿管上段結(jié)石的療效比較[J].廣西醫(yī)學(xué),2014,36(6):805-807.endprint
[6]Yan X,Al -Hayek S,Gan W,et al.Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in preschool age children with kidney calculi (including stones induced by melamine-contaminated milk powder[J].Pediatr Surg Int,2012,28(10):1021-1024.
[7]蔣林濤,李有元,喻俊峰,等.微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石與經(jīng)尿道輸尿管鏡碎石治療輸尿管結(jié)石的對比分析[J].中國當(dāng)代醫(yī)藥,2014,21(8):54-56.
[8]Bayrak O,Seckiner I,Erturhan S,et al.Comparative analyses of percutaneous nephrolithotomyversus open surgery in pediatric urinary stone disease[J].Pediatr Surg Int,2012,28(10):1025-1029.
[9]藍(lán)志相,郝南.經(jīng)輸尿管鞘輸尿管鏡碎石取石治療復(fù)雜輸尿管結(jié)石的臨床研究[J].中國內(nèi)鏡雜志,2015,21(11):1207-1209.
[10]Bhageria A,Nayak B,Seth A,et al.Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy:single -centre 10-year experience[J].J Pediatr Urol,2013,9(4):472-475.
[11]龍清志,李翔,賀大林,等.輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)治療腎和輸尿管結(jié)石2150例的并發(fā)癥分析[J].現(xiàn)代泌尿外科雜志,2016,21(8):606-609.
[12]El-Nahas AR,Shokeir AA,Shoma AM,et al.Percutaneous nephrolithotomyversus open surgery for treatment of staghorn stones in pediatric patients[J].Can Urol Assoc J,2014,8(11):906-909.
[13]楊念龍,艾尼瓦爾·艾爾肯,袁留亞,等.經(jīng)皮腎鏡取石術(shù)與輸尿管鏡碎石術(shù)治療上段嵌頓性輸尿管結(jié)石患者的Meta分析[J].臨床泌尿外科雜志,2014,29(1):14-20.
[14]Onal B,Gevher F,Argun B,et al.Does previous open nephrolithotomyaffect the outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children?[J].J Pediatr Urol,2014,10(4):730-736.
[15]曹剛,鄭如華,金永有,等.B超監(jiān)測在輸尿管鏡氣壓彈道碎石術(shù)治療輸尿管上段結(jié)石的應(yīng)用研究[J].中國內(nèi)鏡雜志,2014,20(6):659-661.
[16]Tepeler A,Sancaktutar AA,Taskiran M,et al.Preoperative evaluation of pediatric kidney stone prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy:is computed tomography really necessary?[J].Urolithiasis,2013,41(6):505-510.
(收稿日期:2017-08-16 本文編輯:許俊琴)endprint